Maybe we really needed his help!
Why didn't he help!
Did we lose the war because of Bush?
2006-11-01 10:28:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We did lose and he wasn't there.
2006-11-01 10:31:15 · update #1
Our troops could have used his help. Lots of them died because he wasn't there to lead them and save their lives.
2006-11-01 10:32:49 · update #2
Doc, I don't wish that on anyone.
2006-11-01 10:33:14 · update #3
I am a Vietnam Veteran, US Army '68-70. I wasn't in the Seabees though, Thank you for your great work! Camp Eagle.
2006-11-01 10:35:39 · update #4
43: Vietnam is totally communist now, more so than Red China.
2006-11-01 10:49:50 · update #5
No but America might be a better place had he not been born.
2006-11-01 10:32:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Although it is doubtful that any one soldier could have changed the outcome, any action by a military member would have added or subtracted from America's total honor to duty and service.
I do not wish to see the name George W. Bush added to The Wall, but I also do not want to see any added names etched on that stone, because he choose not to use the skills he was trained for, in time served to his country.
2006-11-01 18:57:59 · answer #2 · answered by navymom 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If by lose you mean win every battle we ever had in Vietnam and kill many more of the enemy than anyone ever dreamed, than yeah, I guess we did lose in Vietnam.
Funny how no one even mentions the hundreds of miles of road the American Seabees built there.
I wasn't a Seabee but I know a few, and thanks for your service.
2006-11-01 18:33:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Mister Eagle:
If I am not mistaken the Vietnam war was to prevent Communism from expanding into Indochina.
The last time I checked Southeast Asia is not under any form of Communist control.
Thank you
Go big Red Go
2006-11-01 18:40:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
What lost the war was not the lack of good men in Vietnam.
It was the lack of good people in the media, the lack of qualified people in the Pentagon and the lack of trust worthy people in Congress
Vietnam was not lost because of Bush. But it might have been lost because of Kerry (and the rest of his circus)
2006-11-01 18:40:31 · answer #5 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
If his leadership in Iraq is any indication of his abilities, I think we were better off without him.
2006-11-01 18:59:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ha ha, that's funny. bush most likely would of ran the other way if he was in the front. wow, still laughing.
2006-11-01 18:37:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Vietnam vets usually remember the way they were spit on when they came home from Vietnam...
KERRY spit on them again.
2006-11-01 18:45:22 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
we didn't lose because he wasn't there!
but we ARE LOSING IN IRAQ.
2006-11-01 18:30:09 · answer #9 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋