I have a home life. I'm not the job. If I can't get the job done in the normal time then so be it. maybe they should have had more people working on it than just me. I hate my job. I work with lazy butt hole surfers. sorry I had to vent.
2006-11-01 09:06:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by pnybt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't. I don't like to work that much. I might some if I needed the money but then I would go home and enjoy my life. Life is to short to spend it all at the office.
2006-11-01 09:06:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ask Me 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hell no I wouldn't work constantly! I would work more when I needed some more money and I would work maybe an extra hour or two each week.
I can live off my income just fine. Working is for the birds. I only do it because I have to. I'll take fewer toys and more time off, thanks.
2006-11-01 09:07:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i would work no more than50 hours week , you have to have a life outside work and there is a point where your overtime will get eaten up by taxes as it will put in a higher tax bracket for the pay period .
2006-11-01 09:06:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my personal experience people usually works to earn certain amount of money. Does not matter how long they will have to work.. So if they earn more they will want to work less if they earn lower salary they will try to work more.
2006-11-01 09:04:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think that for many, money is a big part of their life so if they got the chance to make as much money as they need they will do it probably no matter what the cicumstances are
2006-11-01 09:04:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by the_doc2002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't work constantly but I definitely would work more!
2006-11-01 09:03:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nunya 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would work a more..but no so much that it would make me too tired..i would work so it fit secudule also!
2006-11-01 09:05:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by !Kemberly(: 2
·
0⤊
0⤋