Right now I would say Kerry, I truly beleive his remark will be the spark to make the republicans get out and vote. I know our local veterans groups are doing a push now since he said what he did.
And most of the polls we have done are showing republicans in the lead slightly in most places now.
2006-11-01 08:48:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Kerry over Rove. Rove said ignore the attacks. The worst advice possible.
2006-11-01 08:50:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gone Rogue 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good question. I'll have to give the nod to Kerry. He just can't keep his foot out of his mouth. He thinks he's smarter than everyone and he doesn't realize that we can see straight through him.
His wife seems to think that they are some sort of royalty that doesn't have to live by the rules of the common man, treat anyone else with respect, or even pay their taxes. Their mansion in Pittsburgh is listed as a farm so that they have cheap taxes. Do you really think that John and Tereza are growing corn on the back nine?
.
2006-11-01 08:47:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
god... I thought there for a second that rush was going to do the republicans in by attacking michael j. fox. thank goodness for john kerry!!! I don't care about his half azzed appology... he said what he meant! phuck him, limp-diked mo-fo! I was in the air force, three cousins are still in. dad and uncle was in 'nam. four friends hopping back and forth between afganistan and iraq. Geez, and this is the best that the democrats could put out just two years ago?!!
2006-11-01 08:54:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by johnbehrhart 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mr. Kerry had nothing to lose. Just like a liberal, wants to give everybody else's opportunities away.
2006-11-01 08:50:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
if you're observing for a heritage it particularly began throughout the time of Goldwater's marketing campaign even as the Christian nicely perfect became once first forming, the leaders took an interest in Goldwater, in spite of the indisputable fact that it genuinely wasn't till Nixon's Southern technique the position he pandered to the Christian correct to win the South (and subsequently on the time the election). the problem is that once all and assorted is indoctrinated like the persons you're talking about are it could be very nearly not accessible to purpose with them and a baby-kisser does not quite have a purpose to attempt to modify critiques, in a democratic equipment it really is way less demanding to understand and secure energy by skill of pleasing to a delegated base. it could be even a lot less complicated to promote books to them which do not contradict thier beliefs, take a seem on the politics section at your close by bookstall. i'd say it may take about thirty to 40 years at minimum or 50 to sixty years at optimal. it really is how lengthy it really is going to take the nut-jobs to die, with a bit of luck after residing chuffed lives not ruined by technique of the coverage regulations they recommend, and subsequently stop vote casting. yet then on condition that intellectuals artwork flat out to coach and encourage youthful persons. Oh and for the persons who want to call one i will do you one larger a itemizing of the religious idiots ruining the GOP: Pat Robertson, former presidential hopefull Michelle Bachaman, Congresswoman cutting-edge presidential hopeful Rick Perry cutting-edge Governor of Texas prayed for rain even as slicing the fireman's money for the era of wildfires Jerry Falwell useless now yet founding father of the "moral majority" Robert furnish writer of The Christian Voice Ralph E. Reed, Jr. obviously the governmentof The Christian Coalition Oral Roberts useless in spite of the indisputable fact that founding father of Oral Roberts college which seems "proficient" zealots. Mark Rutland took over from Oral i'd go on in spite of the indisputable fact that it might get too lengthy
2016-12-05 10:44:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by levatt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
kerry seems to be teh gift that keeps on giving.
though Edwards and Dean baby seem to like giving to
2006-11-01 08:47:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Shouldn't that read--"Thanks again for providing us (the republican party) with a distraction that we can fill the media with so that we don't have to talk about all of our failed policies, bogged down messed up war, economic failings, and environmental disasters?
2006-11-01 08:50:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
John Skerry has helped the Repubs again.
http://www.drudgereport.com/irak.jpg
2006-11-01 08:47:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by F'N Skerry 1
·
5⤊
1⤋
thats funny. you are right, its like i have always said, they are their own worst enemy. thank god!
kerry is such a tool.
2006-11-01 08:47:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by afterflakes 4
·
3⤊
1⤋