He handled the crisis well. and now NK has agreed to return to the six conference talks. No sooner had the ink dried with Secretary Albright's accord with "Dear Leader' then he violated the accord. For him it was "all tricks and treats," Took Madeleine and her boss, Bubba, for suckers.
2006-11-01 09:17:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mannie H 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know what I'm about to say might not be popular, but we should only use force as a last resort. We try to go to the tables, talk, put sanctions in place. We also get our missile defense in place. North and South Korea should also come to the table. Talk with each other and show south korea has no interested in attacking the North. If North Korea does not comply then we start thinking force. Anyone hell bent on having nuclear weapons with no just cause must be considered a danger to neighboring countries and the world. Edit: Also remember the amount of innocennt civilians you would be vapourising and killing because of the actions of their government.
2016-05-23 05:13:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I do not agree with the way foreign affairs have been handled since Bush has been in office. Not only with Iraq (which we should not be there in the first place), to Iran and North Korea. If even one bit of tack had been used, some of this could have been avoided. I think that Bush is the bully here and is the only 'Axis of Evil' that exists....
2006-11-01 08:50:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by wallcritter 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think you know even less than you think you do . President Bush is smarter than you'll ever know -you're a bad parrot .
I think George W. Bush knows what he's doing ; he has a plan and he is not a quitter . Sorry bub-but he's the man in charge . Not you .North Korea has asked to come back to the 6-party talks . What part of that offends you ???
2006-11-01 13:25:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I didn't realize he had done anything about the situation with North Korea. I thought that was the problem. If you consider giving idiotic answers to journalists in this country doing something about it, then I disagree with what he did. Other than that I don't know that he's taken any action at all. Well, he probably prayed about it.
2006-11-01 09:35:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think Bush doesn't care about North Korea because they have nothing he wants! Bush is a piece of ****. The only reason he went after Iraq was for oil. He doesn't care about America or the American people, only what serves his best interest.
2006-11-01 08:40:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by every_single_damn_id_is_taken 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
You know, everyone gets angry because he "goes it alone" with Iraq, and now everyone is upset, because he won't with North Korea.
I think it doesn't matter what he does, there are some that will disagree no matter what.
2006-11-01 08:45:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Amy Y 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I honestly don't know what he could do. The man in NK is a nut, its hard to deal with a crazy person.
2006-11-02 08:47:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
And, what was his deal? It seems that it had everything to do with "let China deal with it."
2006-11-01 08:40:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Northkorea don't have any Oil,or natural resources,that's why,Ks
2006-11-01 09:37:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by karl s 3
·
0⤊
3⤋