P.S. this is for a homework project plz say ur age group (under 10, 11-19, 20-40, 50+)
2006-11-01 08:19:59 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
Yes. I agree with the cloning of vital organs. I feel more strongly about stem cell research because it can help people with degenerative nerve diseases. What's wrong with a little stem research if people are living longer, healthier lives? I
2006-11-01 08:24:49 · answer #1 · answered by KND 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Many scientists, docs and researchers have a god-like complicated. by using fact they can't preclude and therapy the ailments we've already got and be bothered by, they experience the ought to return up with innovating innovations to make a acceptance for themselves. Cloning? isn't it God's job to create existence? the place will this lead and the place will it end? Stem cellular learn? Take a factor of a created person and use it to help out an sick human. the place might this lead and the place might it end? Genetic Engineering? Engineering is the observe that throws me right here. i'm against all 3 and no i would not partake in any of them whether i mandatory a coronary heart. Embryonic stem cellular is repulsive to me and the day will come whilst they'll pay women to get pregnant by using fact there are not adequate embryonic stem cells to pass around. guy abuses each and every little thing!
2016-12-28 09:41:36 · answer #2 · answered by dobard 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
* 18
NO!! -- (Cloning)
And the stem cells their two types, embronic, and adult (birth on up). They the scientist sat that the cells from the embyro's 'can' cure many things. but the truth is they haven't been able to get a ure from that it's to unstable, and even if they some how got a cur from them it would be too expensive for the common person. It is also one step away from cloning. So no i do not believe in that but i do believe in adult stem cell research, which they have found that they can use it sucessfully and get cures. In missouri right now they are having an issue over this, and it gose even further in saying (if it passes) that anyone who speaks out aginst cloning, and embryonic stem cell research can be sued. WOW!!!
2006-11-01 08:44:47 · answer #3 · answered by Ducky 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cloning I think would be okay to preserve endagered species, therefore pandas and bald eagles animals of that such....maybe experiment with it with some people that are on death row, to work out fine details to clone humans, but have a law that it is not allowed, unless for some reason humans become endangered... I don't see a reason that any human should be allowed to clone itself to preserve its life, mostly because of two reasons...one the movie multiplicity (it just gets out of hand), two because it would cost so much only the diing people wouldnt be able to get it, but the thugged out rappers could do it cause it would be TIGHT YO! plus the last thing we need is for KIM JUNG ILL to clone a whole f***in army of koreans that he could control to take over the world...BAD BAD BAD THOUGHT!!! but stem cell research is a different story, could help so many people, not only micheal j fox and his parkinsans but the helpless africans could control there milaria and make the world a more peaceful place...plus who knows could help cancer and aids?!?! just cloning is such a scary thought for humans!!!
20 years old
2006-11-01 08:27:39 · answer #4 · answered by frank_the_tank15 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
11-19
Cloning is depends. It is a big advantage if you could clone organs from ur cells to help yourself and this would reduce the amount of people dying from cancers and organ failure. However, I don't want another me running around. It's creepy.
Stem cell definitely.
2006-11-01 08:33:28 · answer #5 · answered by Stary_u 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
11-19
no i don't agree with cloning or stem cell research
2006-11-01 08:35:33 · answer #6 · answered by james_gurl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20-40
I fully support cloning and stem cell research, though i prefer non embryonic stem cell research
2006-11-01 08:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by eyesinthedrk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Notwithstanding arguments to the contrary, I can think of no ethical reason for not doing it, and the potential benefits are huge. (I'm 50+.)
2006-11-01 08:28:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋