What argument could there be against another country to come and take out George Bush as president of the United States and tried for crimes against the world as the U.S. has done to Saddam Hussien?
2006-11-01 06:41:13 · 6 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
International law - no grounds for it.
A stronger case could be made for treason trials for several Democratic leaders. Are you in?
2006-11-01 06:43:16 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The facts are as pointed out by other answers are that:
1. People do need to get out and vote for this countrys' future. there's no sense of urgency, were just sitting by the wayside waiting for the next game console to come out and burning one with our friends. Even people in their late 30's which is scary. where in the hell is this country going to be 5, 10, 15 years from now?
2.the only thing I see at all that George Bush has is moral and religious integrity plus a determination to stop something that probably is out of reach, even with unsurmountable forces. Homeland security is one thing but this War is very political and similar to the Vietnam fiasco.
3. The division between parties and the bashing of candidates is just childish. Just imagine if the country pulled together for 1 week and put all the energy into resolving these big problems and issues together instead of how big they can suck each other off.
4. We desperately need to move into alternative energies such as solar, wind, and hydrogen. I feel the government has a strangle hold on this policy as well and we people in there who can really get this thing going!
The moral of the story is individuals need to take action and not just sit back and wait for somebody else to change the country. that will never happen in my generation (genx by the way) or generations to come if we the people don't act.
2006-11-01 06:45:04 · answer #2 · answered by mannymota 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The world doesn't work that way. The United States--right or wrong--has earned a few privileges because we have an arsenal of nuclear weapons capable of obliterating the universe. With military might like this, the Oval Office has some pretty fierce power--enough to defend our homeland from any conventional attack. It does not, however, prevent a terrorist attack similar to 9-11.
Many believe that Bush's actions in Iraq are criminal, and some feel he should be tried for war crimes. Arguably, he is responsible for the deaths of over 2,800 American soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. He may never get his just dessert in this life, but as a self-proclaimed Christian, he will one day have his day in court with God.
2006-11-01 06:56:31 · answer #3 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Id really like to see someone come after an innocent President..from another Country, no less. He'll be out of office in 2008, not until..
2006-11-01 06:46:11 · answer #4 · answered by Katz 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the USA would retaliate, for the same reason we don't assassinate the leaders of foreign countries
2006-11-01 06:45:10 · answer #5 · answered by Nick F 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not much really. Good point.
2006-11-01 06:43:30 · answer #6 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋