English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so, what kind of test would be appropriate?
Please limit to serious answers in 25 words or less.

2006-11-01 06:24:37 · 14 answers · asked by mstrywmn 7 in Politics & Government Elections

14 answers

Absolutely NOT.

This would be contrary to everything democracy stands for.

Every person of voting age should have an equal right to vote - anything else is not democracy and leads to the type of elite-ism satirised in George Orwell's animal farm - all people will be equal but some people will be more equal than others.

What is more, I refuse to limit my answer on such an important issue to 25 words and there is not a damned thing you can do about it.

I will use my right of free speech and my right to vote no matter how much you might disagree with my ability to choose wisely.

Too many people don't have this luxury and too many people died ensuring I do have it. I will treasure and defend my right and the right of others to speak and vote freely.

2006-11-01 06:52:11 · answer #1 · answered by Sue 4 · 2 0

No, I agree with the posters above that said it is undemocratic. There is no way for a test to be properly created that will not create a bias toward one party or the other.

Gerrymander is the same way and should be banned.

In 25 words or less: No. Voting is a right, not a privilege.

And to the person above -
These people can't directly affect these things, but they do have a strong influence on them.

The president cannot make laws, but if he proposes a law to congress, and congress is a rubber stamp like it has been for the past six years, he just made a law.

Congress and the president don't directly control oil prices, but their economic and foreign policies do affect prices. There are also laws on the books that should prevent the anti-trust actions of big oil, but are ignored in favor of campaign donations.

2006-11-01 06:34:57 · answer #2 · answered by John J 6 · 1 0

yes

first they would have to be alive - in new orleans so many voted who were already dead....how? we'll never know

second - they would at least have to know the names of the candidates and their views on issues

third - either a valid i.d. card, driver's license or something to prove they are who they say they are.

fourth - if you don't ever vote or haven't voted for years you have to reapply, with the right of voting should come some responsibility and voting once every 10-15 yrs does not show you're a concerned or responsible citizen

2006-11-01 06:31:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

i might incredibly be in want of voters being quizzed on the place the applicants stand on the subject concerns so we are able to sidestep the problem of persons in basic terms vote casting quickly fee ticket. The voter might ought to coach 60% performance while answering questions on the subject of the candidate they decide to vote for and it is finished weeks or maybe months forward of the election to shop time and you will possibly have 3 possibilities at taking this quiz to coach you know 60% or extra on the subject of the candidate or the modification it incredibly is up for vote. which would be my own theory.

2016-10-21 02:31:30 · answer #4 · answered by turrill 4 · 0 0

Yes!!! A basic civics exam, which most people on here would likely fail. I think, nay, I know it is a must for people to know how our government works in order to cast an intelligent vote. If I see one more question saying the politicians control the gas prices or the President can make laws I will puke.

2006-11-01 06:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0 2

You don't have to pass a test to run for office, why should you have to pass a test to vote?

2006-11-01 06:26:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

They are. Immigrants have to pass a test on American history and culture.

2006-11-01 06:26:48 · answer #7 · answered by Earth Queen 4 · 3 0

No, everyone doesnt vote now as it is. I think it would be even more of a deterrent than anything else.

2006-11-01 06:30:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

We had such a system and it was specifically designed to keep blacks from voting. Read your history books. Enough already!

2006-11-01 06:27:29 · answer #9 · answered by retiredslashescaped1 5 · 4 1

yeah, make sure you know who in the hell your voting for!

2006-11-01 06:29:50 · answer #10 · answered by mannymota 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers