2006-11-01 05:56:50 · 16 answers · asked by Daniel C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Honestly? Someone we're not even seriously thinking about yet.
It's happened before - someone comes from almost out of nowhere.
2006-11-01 05:59:18 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The person most likely to win the the person 1) most politically savvy and 2) most well positioned. This is, of course the wonderful Ms. Clinton.
But I really wish somebody less skilled in prevarication would get the Dem. nomination and also the presidency.
(As a side note: Hillary Clinton probably has considerable misgivings about the death penalty personally, but she also knows that her viability as a presidential candidate rests on her ability to resist the dreaded "Liberal" label. Agreeing to kill is a way of thus avoiding the label. She is a politician to the core, just like her husband, the master rhetorician.)
2006-11-01 06:02:35 · answer #2 · answered by voltaire 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the last President Election, the voters had a choice between Gore and Bush Jr.
I being a tree-hugger and animal lover, had thoughts that maybe Gore was the better choice.
But then 9/11 happened.
Then I knew the right man was our President.
Because when it comes to the USA, better we are headed by a Hawk than a Dove.
Do not judge a candidate by his/her party, or by a member of his/her party that is a predator, or by a member of his/her party that maligns our Troops.
Take your thoughts outside the United States. Think of all those who would like to overtake your country and make you slaves to their ideology, and take away your American freedom.
For your own and our country's good; I sincerely hope, the US voters, always vote for the Hawk candidate to lead and protect our country.
2006-11-01 06:20:09 · answer #3 · answered by rara avis muse 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whoever i imagine is nice for each activity on the poll. In 2008 I voted for Bob Barr, in 2012 I voted for President Obama. So searching on who makes it onto the polli will study and confirm on the instantaneous.
2016-12-05 10:36:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton
2006-11-01 05:58:33 · answer #5 · answered by condy 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton
2006-11-01 05:57:50 · answer #6 · answered by texas0413 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
George Bush again. That's right, he'll find a way to get the supreme court to declare the 22nd amendment unconstitutional so he can run again. God help us all.
2006-11-01 06:03:57 · answer #7 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Oreily said dem.s on Letterman's show even wrote a book about it and Daves in it.
2006-11-01 05:59:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Karl Kalisnikov, and I'll pick someone from Yahoo Answers to be my running mate.
2006-11-01 06:02:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Might help if we knew who'd be standing? It won't be Bush, and probably not Kerry, so I can't honestly tell you who'd win.
2006-11-01 08:18:42 · answer #10 · answered by SteveUK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋