English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm looking for a birth control bill/patch/shot that does not contain synthetic hormones but actually contains natural hormones. I can find information on non-synthetic hormone replacement but not non-synthetic birth control. What's that about? Menopausal women can have options but sexually active fertile women can't?

2006-11-01 05:31:08 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Women's Health

2 answers

You know, this is a really interesting question, to which I had no idea of the answer. Well done! So I hit up google and this is what I found.

As far as I can tell, the answer is that there isn't any nonsynthetic hormonal birth control out there. Why? I'm also unsure of the answer to this one but I can make a guess.

1. Availability: Progesterone and estradiol, the two hormones used in synthetic form, do not occur in nature outside of the human body. The people who pursue natural alternatives would presumably have an ethical problem with the extraction of these from living people:)
2. Cost: It is cheaper to make a synthetic product than rely on natural sources. As an example, so-called natural progesterone is extracted from yams... but what if one year's bad weather destroys the yam harvest? All your customers are hosed. Or if some yams have much higher hormone levels than others? It'd take a lot more work to get a consistent, high-purity product that would pass the strict FDA regulations, and big pharma companies don't want to spend the money or time.
3. Demand: If an unregulated natural therapy fails to help your menopausal symptoms, what happens? You have hot flashes, night sweats, vaginal dryness, etc. Usually they will go away on their own in a few years, or you can live with them. If a birth control method fails you're stuck with an unwanted pregnancy, leading to an abortion, adoption, or 18+ years of caring for a kid. The consequences are more severe, making people more inclined to try a vasectomy or Copper-T IUD or condoms than purchase a possibly ineffective drug.

2006-11-01 06:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by MissA 7 · 0 0

beginning administration at a youthful age is extra healthy than beginning administration for older women persons (like over 30). by capacity of youthful age, i think you propose mid-youth. i began taking beginning administration at age sixteen and not in any respect had any problems. the main important probability of beginning administration pills is blood clots, however the prospect is small while you're youthful, do no longer smoke, and have not have been given any kinfolk background of blood clots. There are different side outcomes like weight benefit, moodiness, and worse PMS symptoms. those could be fastened by capacity of changing the beginning administration pill you're on. for many persons the advantages outweigh the hazards. beginning administration pills regulate your era, shrink cramps, sparkling zits, preclude ovarian cysts, lighten and shorten your era, and needless to say preclude being pregnant. they are extra effective than 10% extra powerful at combating being pregnant than condoms on my own. communicate on your medical expert approximately how beginning administration must be sturdy for you.

2016-10-21 02:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers