I feel your pain, however, you should familiarize yourself with the U.S. Constitution and learn that the pursuit of happiness is a very basic presumed right. High economical status is not a requirement for multiple children. Sorry grasshopper.
2006-11-01 05:24:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's kind of a mean way of saying it. I too think there should be something done about people turning it into a career choice. There are too many "medical conditions" why people continue to abuse the welfare system as well. I think you qualify for endless benefits if you have nail fungus these days. Some genuinely need the help but like you said "laziness" is not a qualification as far as I'm concerned either. Sterilization isn't the only thing that is going to help. "Dead beat parents" paying their child support or being in their children's life consistently AND not continuing to have more and more children AND staying out of jail AND holding down a job would help as well. If you are capable of making children, you should be capable of taking responsibility to care for them properly. Sterilization is a start but not enough to make a big difference. People receive welfare for numerous things not just having children.
2006-11-01 05:35:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by mother_flower 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because some human beings do burst off welfare and that is continually not available to get rid of the chip. So--notwithstanding in the adventure that they were deactivated--you'll tie up database area with those who were not required to be chipped. more effective, cats and dogs are in a lot of situations chipped contained in the shoulder section yet human anatomy is somewhat different. the position would you chip the welfare recipients? (Forearms does not artwork o.k. at this degree of market progression.)
2016-12-05 10:33:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can think of another regime that supported eugenics, which is exactly what you're describing. They were led by a nebbish who was an expert at demagoguery, and he ended up being responsible for the murders of 6 million Jews, Gypsies, and other minorities, including the mentally and physically infirm. Sadly, this seems to be the legacy you want to leave for this nation, though thankfully, you're fairly alone.
2006-11-01 05:25:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ivallinen Roisto 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
So you've got a group you'd like to sterilize against their will. Well, move to the back of the line. Let's start with the criminals and move on to the insane. Then there are the mentally handicapped etc. etc.
Who decides? Who has that right? Better hope your name doesn't show up on somebody else's list.
2006-11-01 05:16:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
They're not allowed to. The state of south carolina sterilized a crack addict who just kept having kids and oh boy did people have a fit.
2006-11-01 05:19:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by smm 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
So, when does it end? If the government finds something about you that it doesn't like can they sterilize you?
Sterilizing them won't change the fact that they are on welfare.
Why don't we just get rid of welfare and take away the incentive for laziness.
2006-11-01 05:14:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
How about sterilizing the half dozen guys who helped?
2006-11-01 05:12:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by sarcastro1976 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Oh I agree!! I have nothing against helping those who really need it. But to be on welfare and still keep getting pg, then NO! You should have to be fixed to stay on welfare!! Some of these women train their daughters on how to get on it and stay on it. It's nonsense!!
2006-11-01 05:16:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by wish I were 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
actually, in our county or state, not sure which, there is a guy that's trying to get that to happen
2006-11-01 05:19:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋