English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

COUNTRY. Can you HONESTLY TRUST any DEMOCRAT after their LEADERSHIP does something like that?

And then, given ample opportunity to APOLOGIZE. . .. .He REFUSES. Well, I for one, am mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it EVER.

2006-11-01 04:17:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

Kerry, Pelosi, Dean, Clinton, Kennedy, etc. they represent the democrats and the american people are smart enough to see thru these scumbags.

2006-11-01 04:21:53 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 2 3

both the Dem's' and re pubs' can not often agree on something even even as they want an same component. except you visit c-span you received't see a lot coverage of 0.33 party applicants. large organizations make wide contributions to applicants they help,you're constrained in how a lot you are able to donate to a candidate in my opinion. organizations set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the hot financial disaster guidelines were written by technique of the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them contained in the butt. the different challenge is that some human beings vote for a million party continuously,both because they help that party continuously and believe that is the in basic terms party to do whats correct,or they are disillusioned with the different party for some reason. both activities want it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I study on the internet very last evening is even 1/2 authentic,this election received't count number besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a important disaster till now the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will change into the authentic capacity of authorities. If it takes position after the elections and till now the hot president takes place of work,i do not comprehend what's going to take position. G.W. signed an govt order for the continuity of authorities and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the structure and the President might want to be the team spirit govt. Congress and the total courtroom will nonetheless exist yet could have little or no voice,the President has the ultimate say in all concerns. there became also yet another website speaking about the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. structure will be gone.

2016-12-05 10:31:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Can I trust a Democrat who has insulted the entire country? Well, let's see. We're being run by a man who has insulted both our own country and the rest of the world with his unbelievable arrogance. Also, Kerry's statement was a joke, albeit a very very poor one, and in no way can compare to the amount of failure and disappointment our current leadership has shown. If you want to talk about distrust and refusal to apologize, let's start with good ole GW.

2006-11-01 04:24:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Of course. This Administration (the Republicans) needs to be held accountable for every Constitutional screw-up they've done in the last 6 years. Period.

Kerry did not speak for the Democrats. But look for an apology, forced by the Democratic Party.

As far as voting for King George...NEVER!!!! He (and his neo-conservatives), have destroyed America and I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!!!! When the "newly elected Democratic House" takes control, I hope they impeach King George!!!!!! AND I MEAN IT!!!!!

2006-11-01 04:30:33 · answer #4 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 1 1

Don't forget, this is the same piece of work that, under oath before congress in the 70's said that every US soldier, himself included, in Vietnam was a war criminal and murdered, raped, tortured, and destroyed indiscriminately and with cruelty.

He also traveled to Paris to confer with the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese who were negotiating with the US. While the war was still on. While he was still in the inactive Reserves. This is called: treason.

Why should anybody believe he has ever cared about US troops? He's a traitor, a liar, a loathsome man. And he almost became president??!! God help us!

2006-11-01 04:31:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I will not blame anyone else for what John Kerry said but would not vote him in as dog catcher because of this incident. It showed a distinct lack of discretion.

2006-11-01 04:19:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If you want to be mad and carry an eternal grudge over the spin the GOP put on Kerry's comment ABOUT BUSH, you go right ahead, Sparky.

Besides, Kerry DID apoloigize about 25 minutes ago, for phrasing it in such a way as to be deliberately misconstrued by spinmeisters.

2006-11-01 04:19:31 · answer #7 · answered by kreevich 5 · 1 4

True colors have shown through. Imagine if he had been our President. He is a disgrace and I hope his career is over.

2006-11-01 04:20:06 · answer #8 · answered by only p 6 · 3 3

nice rant, got a question? BTW, there are far worse things thanKerry that make our country look bad. See Rumsfeld's arrogance in Iraq.

2006-11-01 04:20:01 · answer #9 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1 4

That di$kead will never be President. Kerry you are done.

2006-11-01 04:19:41 · answer #10 · answered by yankeescowboyssooners 2 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers