2006-11-01 03:19:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
jon obi mikel never played for united. united had an agreement wit him but then he made a statement sayin his family was treatened into signin the contract so when chelsea wanted him they had to give united 10 million quid for his contract
2006-11-01 03:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by Whitey 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Obi Mikel did not play a single match with Man U and was not even been presented in United jersey. He only had a pre-contract with Man U as he was a FC Lyn player. When Chelsea wanted to buy him they paid Man U about £11m as they had a pre-contract and only £4m to Fc lyn.
2006-11-01 03:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by Karine G 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
john obi mikel has not played for man untd but he should have came to man u instead of chelsea should i tell u why now he is playing for chelsea but he is just on the bench if he stays in chelsea jose will turn him into a bench warmer but if he had have came to man u he wouldnt be on the bench because roy keane is gone and that why was alex ferguson wanted him to take keanes plays and thats the same position he plays in as he didnt come to man u alex ferguson decided to buy micheal carrick instead does that tell u all u need to know now i hope it did
2006-11-01 04:40:43 · answer #3 · answered by sniperrifle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He signed a contract with United, but NEVER played for them. When he heard Chelsea were interested, he claimed United forced him into signing (may have had something to do with more money perhaps???). United were going to take it to UEFA as the player had signed the contract, but then they reached an agreemwnt with Chelsea to release him from the contract. Chelsea paid 12million to United and 4million to his club FC Lyn.
Not bad business for United. 12millon for a player that never even played for them!
Hope this answers your question
2006-11-01 18:56:18 · answer #4 · answered by Cassie_82 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
guy u had paid the signing fee for obi and loaned him out to lyn oslo to mature not realising that a skills can't be hidden then got here chelsea who kept close eye on the type of the lad quickly after his ideas-blowing perfomance on the ultimate less than 20 international cup on the netherlands the position he became voted because the 2d mvp in the back of messi he quickly stuck the interest of chelsea who manipulated him into signing yet another settlement so then guy u took the case to courtroom and fifa gave the decision that guy u would accept the signing fee for the participant and lyn oslo also yet i nonetheless stand to be corrected he made the stunning mistake of his occupation going to chelsea and he's already reaping the dividend.
2016-12-05 10:26:39 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, but he should be. what a gimp. i can see how he would fit in to the man united side, but i can't see him playing too much for chelsea.
i don't mind players moving for money, or for glory (everyone wants money and glory) but man united are still a successful side with a bright future, and besides that, he would actually be playing a lot of games
2006-11-01 05:24:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
mikel arteta? if so no hes only played 4 everton in the prem,we got him from rangers x
2006-11-01 03:27:45 · answer #7 · answered by jo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fortunately no. He doesn't deserve a club that will only win 'Mickey Mouse' Cups. (Carling Cup)
At Chelsea, he has a chance to win everything in England and possibly, the Champions League.
2006-11-01 04:27:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you mean jon obi mikel the glory hunter then no he didnt & im glad he didnt cos he will end up a cheat like drogba & essien
2006-11-01 04:02:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
mikel who? if you mean mikel arteta then no.
2006-11-01 03:24:14 · answer #10 · answered by Wulber1973 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋