Wow, they say will still haven't found any WMDs? They still say Al-Queda had no connections to Iraq? They still say Bush and Rove knew about 9/11 before 9/11?
Will they (extreme-liberals) ever learn?
2006-11-01 03:05:31 · 8 answers · asked by MackDaddy10 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Won't they ever tune in to other news channels other than NBC, ABC, or CBS, and oh yeah, the Clinton News Network?
2006-11-01 03:12:11 · update #1
Not only were some WMDs found in Iraq, but one of Hussein's former henchmen admitted that several dozen shipments of unmarked crates were sent into Syria over the years when the UN wasn't allowed to come into the country. Hmm...I wonder what was in those unmarked shipments? What would need to be unmarked and shipped to Syria...especially several dozen truckloads?
2006-11-04 01:43:41 · update #2
I'm not sure what your point is - they never did find evidence of WMD's in Iraq, and there was no legitimate connection between Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's government. (I'm with you on the 9/11 bit.) What do you want the extreme-liberals to learn - to deny reality?
2006-11-01 03:51:56 · answer #1 · answered by JerH1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you seriously saying that Iraq perpetrated attacks on American Soil? Are you disputing the fact that in all of the "WMD checks" they found none? Not one? Was it not mostly Saudis that flew planes into our buildings? Why not go after them? Or Iran (are they developing nukes)? or North Korea (they have nukes)? or Syria? Maybe we should have gone into Africa and ended the genocide there? GW wanted to one-up Daddy Bush!!! Afghanistan I understood. But Iraq? Come on? Will the neo-cons ever get their heads outta the sand?! Hey, wait, there's oil under that there sand....maybe we should blow it to Kingdom Come trying to get it.....
2006-11-01 03:16:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did you hear they had WMD's? Malkin? Coulter? Last I recall, however, N. Korea does have nukes. Why aren't we there? And as much as you blame Clinton for not acting on warnings and information prior to events of terrorism during his presidency, why do you give Bush a pass, unless you assume the Intelligence was much more vague, even negligent under Bush on purpose, thus passing the blame to them entirely? And as for the Al-Qaeda connection, you know who is connected to them? Here's a clue; Bush doesn't care about him. Osama bin Laden!
Amazing how easily I broke all your arguements, isn't it. Go ahead, report me for telling the truth and shaming the naive.
2006-11-01 03:12:25 · answer #3 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, have they found any WMD's?
I don't think so.
Registered Republican retired military police (Army), and i know Bush lied! So how many must die for his lie?
2006-11-01 03:14:49 · answer #4 · answered by mhp_wizo_93_418 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
MackDaddy...what a funny name for a person who just blindly follows.
2006-11-01 03:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're a Fascist.
2006-11-01 03:10:44 · answer #6 · answered by Fire_God_69 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
can you believe it....you still think the Bush is honest.......oh, you believe the Bush have the American people at best interest.......great to know there are so many people that are in denial.....and defending that liar........
2006-11-01 03:09:42 · answer #7 · answered by teaspoon520 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
More spin?................ Ssssh. The people are onto you. ;-)
2006-11-01 03:08:52 · answer #8 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋