its funny that even though most of us know that bush lied about the reasons to invade iraq in the first place, and therefore most of us already know that iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or al qaeda or bin laden, yet you still see people saying "support the war/support our troops". why? just because we're already there? iraq didnt attack us, but we indade their country. similarly, canada, iceland, or any other country that didnt attack us could have been invaded by bush for the exact same reason. bush could have gotten "sources" to come up with fake "evidence" that ANY country was supporting terrorism, and send in our troops with no evidence, just like he did with iraq. in such a case, would we still be saying "support our troops"?
2006-11-01
02:46:50
·
6 answers
·
asked by
unkerpaulie
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics