I have played both at the University level.
Rugby players in their own right are incredibly rugged.
But American Footballers are monsters.
The size and speed is incredible. Suited to the sport.
Pads or not playing American football they would win just on sheer speed.
Playing Rugby.. Amercan footballers would be lying in broken heaps all over the field.
2006-11-01 02:23:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kaustaub 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sans pads. American footballers are bigger and faster than rugby players. The linemen way up to four hundred pounds and the speed backs run a 4.3 forty and weigh between 250 and 160. You figure it out. BTW. you forgot to mention what they would be playing. I give the Americans the advantage in both sports but the clear advantage in American Football.
2006-11-01 02:38:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by LORD Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The rugby players of coarse. They`re some tough guys.
2006-11-01 02:23:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hamish 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
rotfl...
there would be tiny bloody bits of the American Football players all over the field
those rugby guys don't phuq around
2006-11-01 02:21:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The rugby players no doubt about it.
2006-11-01 02:20:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be the very least of my cares, lol. I'd be too into looking at all that cute booty-meat bouncing around freely on all those strong sexy dudes.
2006-11-01 02:22:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by High? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My money is on the rugby players.
2006-11-01 02:21:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes cause Americans have guns.
2006-11-01 02:22:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well the KKR will finish up the tournament on a high note and it will automatically help the RCB to qualify for the playoffs. the only advantage for Sunrises is the home support otherwise the whole country will be supporting the KKR for RCB.
2016-03-28 03:26:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
rugby everytime
2006-11-01 02:28:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋