For those who have read the book, then watched the Harry Potter movie. What things where how you invisioned. Did the actors/places/objects in the movie look like you thought they would? What looked the same? What looked different. How did you think they would look?
2006-11-01 02:00:13 · 7 answers · asked by terra_chan 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
My brother said the books were always better than the movies because you got more details in the books and the other characters (Ron, Hermione) were better developed in the books. He says Ron comes off like an absolute doofus on screen.
2006-11-01 02:03:45 · answer #1 · answered by Christabelle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The movie wasn't at all as I expected it would be. Goblet of Fire was the first HP movie that I'd actually sat down to watch, and I pictured Hogwarts to be a lot different. I wasn't happy with the way the story had to be altered in order to fit into the time line of the movie. No house-elves? What is that? :)
2006-11-01 02:51:52 · answer #2 · answered by BeezKneez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
things looked like I thought they would - however the books are better as things had to be left out in the movie
2006-11-01 03:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Angelina 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the movies were worse! many important parts of the books were left out in the movie!
2006-11-01 02:25:03 · answer #4 · answered by tokyo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i was so pissed at the movies. they left out so many importatn details and they also go things mixed up. but for the most part the charactors were exactly how i envisoned them..except for Hermione straighting her hair
2006-11-01 02:45:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was disappointed that a lot of the story had to be adapted away.
More or less, the vision is close to as I imagined it
2006-11-01 02:02:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
where can i got to ask adult questoins?
2006-11-01 02:08:44 · answer #7 · answered by morsesdjserv 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋