Notice that for quite some time that the Dems have been criticizing President Bush for his handling of the war. The Dems say they can do better. Can they? Look back at the Vietnam War.
The Dems fought that war and that was a disaster. We lost 58,209 troops in that war and we sent around three million soldiers there. The war lasted around 30 years and the Dems could not even complete the primary objective which was, To ensure that Communist did not take over the country. There was even controversy on why we went to that war when it had nothing to do with the U.S.
Now take a look at the current war. We have only fought for around 5 years and we were successfully able to complete our primary objective, which was to ensure the freedom of both the Afghan's and the Iraqi's. We have only sent around 300,000 to both regions but yet instead of losing 58,290 soldiers, we have only lost around 3,000., which by the way is the fewest amount of KIA in any war that the U.S has fought in.
2006-11-01
01:34:53
·
11 answers
·
asked by
TJ
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
So from reading the following, who is obviously able to follow through and win and not embarrass the U.S? Republicans. Who was able to complete their primary objective? Republicans. And please don't give me crap that Vietnam as worse than Iraq b/c its not. In Vietnam, we didn't have maniocs blowing up themselves. So it's been proven by history, which never tells a lie, that when it comes to success, Republicans are able to see it through, whereas Dems are disasters waiting to happen.
2006-11-01
01:39:28 ·
update #1