Questions about 9/11?

Question

1. Bush's family has been in business with the bin Laden family for decades and the bin Ladens have funded several projects. Why, then, would Osama orchestrate an attack on America while Bush was in office?

2. Why was Building 7 "pulled" when there was no significant damage while the Bank next to the buildings that were hit by the planes remained unharmed?

3. Why was over 100 of bin Laden's family flown out of the country when all air travel had been halted?

4. Why was an insurance of over a billion dollars (he actually tried to seven billion) contract taken out by the owner of the World Trade Towers immediately before they were attacked?

5. Why did the White House inform certain government officials not to fly into New York on 9/11?

By the way, this is all documented. I'm just wondering what everyone thinks. Is it unpatriotic to ask such questions or unpatriotic to ignore them?

Ralfcoder - what would you consider to be a reputable source?

I appreciate all the opposing viewpoints, by the way. It doesn't change my views. We're all entitled to our opinions. I was not expecting to have everyone agree.

I saw Farenheit 9/11 when it first came out. These questions are based on me doing some digging on my own. It's really interesting, to say the least.

Answer 1

Ever seen video of 9/11? There's obviously bombs on each floor of the building and you can see them explode. A plane hitting a building that big will not knock it over. Even if the plane could knock over the building, the towers fell straight down and not to the side like they should've if the planes made them fall. It was obviously an inside job. They wanted to scapegoat someone to start a war. The United States government is making a fortune from the war. No doubt that in agreeing to be scapegoated, Bin Laden made a fortune and is probably making money off the production of weapons for the Islam side. However, most of the weapons used against the United States are bought from the United States. The US was so sure that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction because the US sold them those weapons after the Vietnam war.
I think it is patriotic to ask questions of the government. However, every American has gun in case they need to have a revolution to overthrow the government. Why hasn't there been a mass uprising to overthrow the current government?

Answer 2

You watched 911 Ferenheit didn't you? Not that there is anything wrong with that, I did too. I also read the 911 Commission Report and studied a little bit about Osama Bin Laden prior to the 911 attacks. The information I retrieved on Osama was from the FBI website, as he was the most wanted man by the FBI since he bombed two U.S. Embassies in Africa, killing many FBI agents. Bin Laden was also responsible for the bombing of the USS Cole.

The FBI was very candid in their explination of why Osama had it out for the U.S. At one time Osama was an ally against the Russian invasions of the middle east. We trained Osama and his troops to stop the spread of communnism. It is believed that once the threat of the communnism was eliminated in the middle east Osama was to receive a reward of sorts. America didn't produce to Osama's satisfaction and Osama began to call us public enemy number one.

During the Clinton administration, he had ample oppurtunity to take Osama down. According to the FBI, Clinton wouldn't invoke the oders to do so. WHY? It was strongly believed that Clinton wouldn't pursue Osama because he had such strong business ties in America. Perhaps those are the same business ties you are referring to above. I guess the Bush family won't stop doing business with a terroist, because hey "who wants to lose money"? There is a greedy thinker for you.

Further, I believe Bush sent Osama's relatives home to avoid retaliation against Osama's family by Americans...and to ensure none of his family members had any bright ideas of their own to execute.

Truthfully, none of us will ever know the whole truth.

I just try to put the puzzle together from what little truth we do get from the media and research.

Good Luck and Take Care

P.S. I just wanted to add, that whatever we are doing in Iraq, I hope it isn't some sort of compromise.

Answer 3

you are correct , it is not unpatriotic to ask questions . check out debunking911.com and it will answer most of these . ladens own family denies laden and has nothing to do with him , building 7 was hit by debree from the other buildings , ther are pictures of it everywhere . i have not seen a source for the family members being flown out , but if that did happen i would assume it happened because the american people were furious and they anticipated a lot of hate towards muslims , which did happen around the country , again his family disowned him . insurance policy's are constantly negotiated for such large real estate , to suggest the owner was in on it would suggest many other people were and still keeping it a secret would be impossible . the white house did not inform officials not to fly .

you are spreading proaganda by saying these things are documented , they are taken way out of context by liberals such as micheal moore . the bottom line is that for the government to set theis up there would have to be thousands of people invlolved and that clearly would be impossible . what the debate should be about is why weren't preventive security procedures in place to stop such a thing from hapening .

Answer 4

Okay, let's see:
1. Osama has been disowned by the Saudi bin Laden family. He is not part of them anymore. That explains number one.
2. It was not "pulled", the firemen were instructed to pull out of there, because there was too much damage (which IS documented, and NOT on conspiracy websites), and it was highly dangerous. The bank was not left unharmed. There were fears that it would collapse as well.
3. That is not true. Airline traffic had resumed.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp
4. That was a VERY public and VERY documented event that started shortly after the World Trade Center bombing of 1993.
5. That is NOT true. Where is the proof of it? There was nothing of the sort. All that the conspiracies say is that certain people (such as the mayor of San Francisco) received PHONE CALLS before travelling. What does that prove?

No, it is not unpatriotic to ask questions. However, it's SILLY to believe everything you read on websites like rense.com and infowars.com, and to believe Loose Change.

Answer 5

America is based on the notion of free speech. These questions must be asked, even if to have them answered in a way that doesn't (honestly) support a conspiracy.

Certainly if there is evidence that all of these assertion are true, it must get out. And here's a scary tidbit for you.

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport.

Answer 6

your statements here are derived from farsity. "Documented" does not include Conspiracy sites or hollywood movies.

You have a right to your opinion. Everyone has a right. When the terrorists detonate a Man Portable nuke in NY or LA, what then? Blame it on the Government again? That is the scary thought. That people, like yourself, believing that our own country is killing it's own people on our soil.

Sad

Answer 7

9/11 Made in USA By BUSH, anyway it was a good way to attack afghanistan or we can say 9/11 the good gate to Middle East and we can see now whats going on after 9/11, Bush Evil man he played the game Really good,

Answer 8

I herd Bush got the FBI to blow the the towers up, if you have watched the videos you will know that there where explosions in other places from where the plane hit.

Answer 9

not all of the Laden family is bad.....Bin I would personaly kill ! I can't believe the Army personnel who found Sadam didn't shoot him in the knee caps !!!

Answer 10

Where did you get this information? Regardless - the government is known for undercover scandels!!