2006-11-01 00:12:11 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Smoke and mirrors from a juvenile mind...frightening we have lasted this long
2006-11-01 00:21:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let's see? Bush is a graduate of Yale University where his grades were higher than John Kerry's.
"Plenty stupid" plen‧ty /ËplÉnti/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[plen-tee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, plural -ties, adjective, adverb
–noun 1. a full or abundant supply or amount: There is plenty of time.
2. the state or quality of being plentiful; abundance: resources in plenty.
3. an abundance, as of goods or luxuries, or a time of such abundance: the plenty of a rich harvest; the plenty that comes with peace.
–adjective 4. existing in ample quantity or number; plentiful; abundant: Food is never too plenty in the area.
5. more than sufficient; ample: That helping is plenty for me.
–adverb 6. Informal. fully; quite: plenty good enough.
Sounds more like you are the one with a grade school mentality t so I'd have to say that neither of the scenarios you posit have value and your question is just dumb.
2006-11-01 08:20:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I agree that we deserve better for president. But smooth words don't make the man, either. When is someone who actually cares about the people going to get into office?
2006-11-01 08:32:41 · answer #3 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush's vocabulary sucks, but his ethics and morals are good, Clinton's vocabulary was great his morals and ethics left alot to be desired. Your choice but I know which type person I would rather have for a friend
2006-11-01 08:17:01 · answer #4 · answered by mark g 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush is a horrible speaker in formal settings. When you listen to him in informal speeches where he is talking off-the-cuff, he's not bad. However, to equate eloquence with intellect or leadership ability is a mistake. Many intelligent people lock-up when speaking. It is not an easy thing to do.
On the other hand, you could have an eloquent speaker like Clinton for President, but who has the morals of a street pimp.
Hhhhmmmmm....I think I'll take Bush.
2006-11-01 08:20:04 · answer #5 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Sure, he's excruciatingly painful to listen to, but isn't everyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard?
It's unfortunate that he's not well-spoken, as our society has apparently become so superficial that many cannot (or simply choose not to) see beyond this particular deficiency.
2006-11-01 08:18:47 · answer #6 · answered by DidacticRogue 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey, theres nothing wrong with a 6th grade vocabulary....as long as you're at 6th grade age!!! lol
2006-11-01 08:14:31 · answer #7 · answered by huggz 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Actions speak louder than words.
2006-11-01 08:17:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Like I care what his vocabulary is?
2006-11-01 08:14:25 · answer #9 · answered by hearts_and_thoughts_2003 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If you were PLENTY SMART and reading the INTERNETS, you should worry about Eye-ran and North Korea's NYOOKYOOLER program.
2006-11-01 08:18:16 · answer #10 · answered by karkondrite 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋