This is in Light of The Legal Ruling of Corporate Responsibility for Shareholders and Management in Relation to Train Crashes. As The Actual People Responsible for The Establishment of Such Companies Can Ministers avoid Charges of Culpability or Does Justice and Society not Have The Right To Judge Them on The Ultimate Responsibility For any Deaths Caused. Witness Churchill`s Self Condemation in Regards to The Dardanelles Disaster or John Nott`s Attempt at Resignation in Regards To The Falkland Islands War In That if He Had Not Diverted The Patrol Ship Endurance Argentina would Never Have Invaded South Georgia
2006-10-31 23:26:18 · 4 answers · asked by sorbus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The Problem is a "Cult of Deniability" has permeated Society in particular The Authorities Most Particular The Cabinet. Witness The Way no
Minister is ever available for Interview on any TV News Channel This would appear to have started With The Beginning of Tony Blairs RiseTo Power Possibly Because of Kirsty Warks Interview with Margaret Thatcher
The First Thing The Government and Big Business does upon being presented with a
Judgement Against Them:
Before They Have even read the judgement:
The Government Law Officer`s Have Launched A Right of Appeal.
Is This Government by Electoral Mandate or
is it Something Else
2006-11-03 00:35:45 · update #1
My Last Friends Answer about Inner Government is The Nub of The Question in that The Decision to Go To War was made by an Inner Cabinet Some of Which Had not been Elected Now Those of This Inner Cadre had been informed that The Charge of Possession of WMD was in the main Unproven.
Does THis Make The Elected Members of This
Traitorous War Criminals?
2006-11-07 01:22:57 · update #2
How would signing such a certificate change anything? Ministers are already liable in the same way as we all are for any accident or injury caused by our own negligence. In fact, they are already double liable - liable as individuals for their part in the matter and liable due to the office that they hold to respond to any criticisms levied by Parliament.
2006-10-31 23:31:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Getting this bunch of New McLabour crooks to admit responsibility for their doings would be like trying to mnail a jellt to the ceiling!
2006-11-03 03:54:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know people will think im crazy however I believe there is a goverment within the government.We vote for the outer shell.
2006-11-07 00:00:07 · answer #3 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes they should, and culpability if they do anything to bring shame to the government eg profumo
2006-10-31 23:35:25 · answer #4 · answered by mini the prophet of fubar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋