English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i think old is gold , there is some chance of mistake or preplanned victory in e.v.machine .

2006-10-31 23:00:37 · 5 answers · asked by prithvi 3 in Politics & Government Elections

5 answers

ballot paper.
a german hacker group just succeeded in editing and copying data from a voting machine:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/10/chaos_calls_for_ban/
Moreover, the most used american voting machine is produced by a neoconservative republican manufacturer. You decide if you want to trust his impartialness

2006-10-31 23:12:34 · answer #1 · answered by thecookieprince 3 · 0 0

The problem with man-made tech is there ALWAYS has to be a flaw! The ev machine can save money with time. It wud need some serious ssecurity...going on. Hackers (and the like) are saddistic pple who want to ruin your day for no apparent reason. I think the e.v.m. is a better choice though.

2006-11-01 07:32:13 · answer #2 · answered by Thabi 2 · 0 0

I prefer the electronic machines, most of the ones out there are very secure with the exception of a few.

2006-11-01 08:58:36 · answer #3 · answered by tnmtngirl 5 · 0 0

How right you are we need the ballot back write in votes let the prescient tally votes to be posted locally ho-ray there are still some real honest folks out there .

2006-11-01 07:59:15 · answer #4 · answered by sosueme534 3 · 0 0

I don't like either one, actually. Corruption is in both activities. If I must choose one, I choose EV.

2006-11-01 07:08:13 · answer #5 · answered by rrrevils 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers