I think it's not good. This practice seems to be spreading. Students are there to learn. If their spelling isn't corrected how can it ever be reinforced?
A lot of the education system has gone daft.
2006-11-01 06:14:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I advocate that the higher restrict for contributions be performed away with, and that the highest payouts in retirement nonetheless stay as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social safeguard isn't a "supply away" application however person who all of us give a contribution to love a financial savings plan, and will have to be included from different makes use of through the federal government. Do you settle or disagree and why? If you're so concerned approximately it then why not; first positioned it again into the personal sector and make to had been no can take out cash from it for his or her possess curiosity, moment pay again each and every penny you will have borrowed from each Social Security and Medicare, 3rd take the unlawful immigrants off of it and those that come over right here however not ever paid a penny to it, and finally have it the equal for everybody; in different phrases executive officers are to perform it and in the event that they desire whatever extra they do it on their possess with out the tax payers investment it?Yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had not ever been particularly modified. They, a organization of pupils, instructed that each one curiosity premiums could be three% or much less for everybody to grow to be wealthy if favored (that need to be precise additionally to taces). The satisfactory fiscal crisis could be, they stated, whilst there have been no curiosity premiums. Why now not do this answer? The wealthy could nonetheless be wealthy. My query is: whilst soial safeguard turns into a obstacle attached to federal money owed, why now not paintings with a balanced or reap funds and spend not more than is available in, as any household has to attempt for? Why now not ban all loobying items so as to get legislation that serve the nation? God bless America.
2016-09-01 05:24:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is a social studies teacher not an english teacher. students will be more than embarressed, when they graduate and in high school they get an F for there social studies paper. the high school teachers will also know who the students 8th grade teacher was
2006-10-31 21:02:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wicked 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow - no wonder these kids seem so dumb. Your sister and her colleagues are doing such a disservice to these poor children. Correcting a child in class should not be an embarressing experience, if the teacher handles the situation correctly.
2006-10-31 20:06:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by maigen_obx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is very sad. If a child goes through life speaking and behaving in ways that are socially unacceptable, they will have one heck of a handicap when the time comes to join that society. A little embarrassment now will help prevent a lifetime of "victimhood" (read:having points against you from the beginning for not being able to use the language correctly, behaving in socially unacceptable ways, and presenting one's self in socially unacceptable ways).
2006-10-31 20:11:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by yellowcab208 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
unfortunatly this is what its come to my sister also teaches , in their school her best friend co worker caught one of her students cheating ,and she did not fail him or take away the test for fear of retribution so she kept an eye on him , that student told his parents what happened they had a meeting with the school baord and the teacher was suspended for "coropral punishment"
2006-10-31 19:59:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by A c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well she knows her job better than you
2006-10-31 20:00:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dr Dee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋