apparently Saw 3 is that disturbing people in the cinema were being sick and fainting and all sorts?

Question

anyone seen it and agree, I don't think I can watch it now.

Answer 1

its the same as the last two. bllod, gore, and retarded people trying to fight for their lives. there is nothing disturbing about it.

Answer 2

Eh Ive seen it and dont agree!! Its sick but its not worth fainting or being sick over I think that could just be a lot of publicity!!Id say they even paid some people to do that if it is true!! It is very gorey but just dont look at the screen for that part if your really that squeamish!

Answer 3

im the biggest Horror wimp!! I squirmed at Paris Hilton being murdered in house of wax for christ sake - however Saw 3 isnt that bad - I felt it concentrated more on a story line!! If you are looking for disturbing than I would say Texas Chainsaw:The beginning is pretty grim as is Hostel..saw 3 however not so!

Answer 4

Hmmm! People of a nervous disposition shouldn't even go to watch that kind of movie anyway. I mean they must have something wrong with them to even be scared when they MUST know that it's not at all real. You know what I think the problem is? I think that in this day and age anything is possible and our psyche holds the premise that what we see on the screen could somehow occur in real life and we inwardly transform it, albeit on a subconscious level, to ourselves. This is perhaps why some people are more sensitive and attuned to their affliction than others.

Answer 5

Hiya, I saw this film at the weekend, a found myself paying £7 just to listen to it, as I couldn't bring myself to actually watch it. I found it disturbing and sick, the maker of the film must have something wrong with them lol However, from what I heard of the film it seemed very good, very bloody film, and i found it quite upsetting to be honest, with all the distressing screams etc. I have previously seen both Saw 1 and 2 and found them bareable - saw 3 is a combination of both, and is alot more violent. I wouldn't reccomend it, unless you are prepared for the shocking images you see. I wouldn't personally recommend it. Take care.

Answer 6

I've seen it, it's very gory and bloody but I doubt it'd cause someone to faint. I think the cinemas are over-exaggerating these "faintings" to build up the hype around the film

Answer 7

i went to see it last night, a few people got up and left through-out the movie. personally i love that kind of film so i thought it was fantastic. the effects are brilliant but if your squeemish i would advice that you save your money. the Saw films are so cleverly made and you dont very often see that sequels get better as they go on!!! can't wait for number 4 (i'm assuming there will be one!!)

Answer 8

I have not heard that. I just heard it sucked...?

Hm, sounds like the Exorcist. I remember people saying the same thing about that. (ooh, when that hit theaters, that was when they used to make it seem more realistic by releasing the smell of vomit, and that screwed people up.)

Haha, the Exorcist.. I just find that move hilarious... I imagine that people are too sensitive, and it's not a big deal, but I haven't seen it.

Most things gruesome or 'scary' to others, are just a joke to me, and make me laugh.. a lot..

Answer 9

it's more disturbing-but it's not to the point where people are fainting and walking out. if you cant handle it-then dont go and see it

Answer 10

i wouldn't say it's bad as such, it's for the strong heared people who won't throw up when looking at the blood and gory stuff, in my opinion it's like any other films there are good bits and bad bits that's just how it works.

Answer 11

that was one of the sickest movies ever, though not a sick as hostel (omg, hostel 2 is coming out soon!) i hated it, do not watch it at the pictures!! its worse that way!!