English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who would you vote for?

2006-10-31 19:32:35 · 10 answers · asked by John Scary 5 in Politics & Government Elections

10 answers

oh .....Pedro...who else
not Kerry thats for sure
read this:

Kerry applied for a deferment in 1966 so he could study in France for a year. Only when he was denied this deferment did he opt to volunteer for the Navy signing an Officer Candidate contract to join the Naval Reserves. It was popular among young men of that day to volunteer in an effort to avoid being drafted into the Army.

Kerry’s contract was for six years of active and reserve duty, and one year of inactive standby reserves. The “three Purple Hearts and out” clause simply made it possible for Kerry to transfer out of harms way. It didn’t void the contract he signed with the Navy. He was still obligated to serve out his contract, a contract that would have seen his active duty ending in 1972 and reserve duty ending in 1978.

In Kerry’s letter asking for early release from active duty he falsely stated that his “regular period of obligated service would be completed in December of this year." On January 3, 1970 Lt. Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower Center in Bainridge, Maryland. On July 1, 1972 Lt. Kerry was transferred to Standby Reserve Inactive. On February 16, 1978 Lt. Kerry was discharged from Naval Reserve.

John Kerry was discharged from active duty, not the military, on January 3, 1970 after serving only three years and eighteen days of his contract with the Navy. At this time he was obligated to attend 48 Naval Reserve drills per year and complete 17 days of active training during each of the years required. But because Kerry hasn’t been forthright with the American people, because he hasn’t been transparent to the point of signing a Form 180 to release the total of his military records – not the incomplete and embellished offerings posted on his campaign website – we’ll never know if he satisfied these requirements or not. Of course, the mainstream media could force him to open his files as they have forced President Bush to do but that would require the media to be non-partisan, something they have consistently proven they’re not.

Even though Kerry’s contract with the Navy mandated that his service would have been completed in total in 1978 it is troubling to note that he didn’t receive an Honorable Discharge until March 12, 2001. This raises questions as to the category of his discharge at the time he left military service. It also raises questions as to how he came to acquire an Honorable Discharge almost 30 years after the fact. But that isn’t the most troubling aspect of the time directly after his service in Vietnam.

It’s interesting to note that no official military records have been released regarding the whereabouts, actions or daily status of John Kerry from January 3, 1970 to July 1, 1972. We know he was active with Vietnam Veterans Against the War during this time and that he even appeared before the Senate, testifying – or perjuring himself – to the atrocities American soldiers were committing, “on a daily basis and with the full knowledge of their superiors,” both actions in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. But where the military is concerned, nothing.

As the liberally biased media start to rehash President Bush’s National Guard record, let’s demand some straight answers from Senator Kerry about his military record beyond the “honors” he insists he acquired. Let’s find out if he satisfied his military obligation and if his actions and testimony after he left the service constitutes activities illegal. Let’s get Senator Kerry to release all of his records so we can truly see who and what he is. It’s the least he can do when asking for the trust of the American people.

2006-10-31 19:43:47 · answer #1 · answered by purpleaura1 6 · 2 0

Pedro

2006-10-31 19:33:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Pedro, hands down:)

2006-10-31 19:41:49 · answer #3 · answered by slashpigeon86 2 · 1 0

RE: was or was not Bill Clinton a good President? Was or was not Bill Clinton a Good President? not talking about the personal life drama. Did he or did he not accomplish whatever he said he was gonna do if he become President. If he Did do. What makes you guys think that Hillary will not do what she said she'll do? Does it make since?

2016-05-23 01:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pedro!!!!!

2006-10-31 19:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Pedro, he looks pretty conservative!

2006-10-31 19:35:26 · answer #6 · answered by *~BETHY~* 6 · 1 0

Pedro, he's my hero

2006-10-31 19:34:16 · answer #7 · answered by kikisdragon 3 · 1 0

Hmm? Pedro. Is he any good at killing Arabs?

2006-10-31 19:44:17 · answer #8 · answered by dingdong 4 · 2 0

john kerry

2006-10-31 19:33:53 · answer #9 · answered by sadgreeneyes3 3 · 1 3

[Pedro]

2006-10-31 20:06:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers