2006-10-31 18:50:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The election was after the invasion. And didnt a lot of Democrats support the invasion?
2006-10-31 19:01:55 · update #1
The 2004 election people! Remember? Kerry vs. Bush?
2006-10-31 19:12:09 · update #2
They were just caught up in the war rhetoric?? LOL. Hilarious.
2006-10-31 19:30:46 · update #3
Duhhh if Kerry was elected he would have built a magic time machine to go back and stop da invasion.
2006-10-31 19:40:02 · update #4
Never would have been there in the first place, is what I believe. Bush was just doing a little revenge bit for daddy at the tune of 500 billion tax payer dollars, and a whole lot of lives.
2006-10-31 19:08:18 · answer #1 · answered by DUMBYA & NO BRAINS 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes. Better to bail and save the troops, than stay and let them die. The Iraqis need to take (ahem) responsibility for their own problems. The sooner the better. How tough is it to understand that?
Add: I never supported the invasion. Democrats in congess did, but most got either caught up in the battle rhetoric, or felt they had to because that's what the people wanted. Almost all have come to their senses fortunately.
2006-11-01 02:58:00 · answer #2 · answered by notme 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes,Senator Kerry may not go to war and he will use his diplomat skill to get out of it. But if he goes to war he will have a brain to get our 140,000 troops out at no time. Wake up and let's bring COMMON SENSE to our people.( Tell me how are we going to pay for our National debt 3 trillion dollars that footing the Iraq war at this point ) Thank you for asking a question and I hope my answer can make a difference )
2006-11-01 03:13:40 · answer #3 · answered by ryladie99 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If "The Man" hadn't stolen the 2000 elections and given it to Bush Jr. we wouldn't have gone to war to begin with.
And Kerry is full of ****!
He is also in kahoots with "The Man".
2006-11-01 03:17:59 · answer #4 · answered by Deegoor 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton wanted to invade Iraq also, because he thought there was WMD's in Iraq. Just think, if the Republican Legislature would have let him, we would be starting our withdrawal from there now. The only reason that the Republicans would not let him do it, was because they threw a tantrum because they did not want Clinton to be a war time president. Looks like it has back fired on you neo-cons.
2006-11-01 04:09:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, because we would be out of Iraq right now if Kerry were elected.
2006-11-01 02:53:24 · answer #6 · answered by reff 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
John Kerry- There is cause enough for the world community to hold him accountable by use of force, if necessary. The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new.
His words not mine!
2006-11-01 03:47:49 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
kerry just got up there and studdered in the short "debates" i voted for him because bush's "hot head" scared me. I'm still afraid that he's trying to wage a war with the world "if your not with us your for the terrorists"
he's crazy
2006-11-01 03:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kerry would have continued with Clinton's best economy ever. People wouldn't have to loose their homes and file bankruptcy by record numbers.
2006-11-01 03:25:23 · answer #9 · answered by SOUTHERN NEOCON 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
We'd have never been in Iraq.
Invading Iraq in retaliation for 9/11 made as much sense as invading Canada would have to retaliate for Pearl Harbor.
Face it. Bush is an absolute imbecile.
2006-11-01 02:55:59 · answer #10 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋