2006-10-31 15:02:15 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Because we live in an unjust world. Also because those in power have no problem sending other people and other people's moms, dads, kids, husbands, wives, etc into an unsafe region rift with depleted uranium under the pretense of keeping us safe. I guess it is because they want the oil or whatever reasons of their own they have. Remember it is better for those who hurt children to have a millstone around their neck and be drowned in the sea than to be them on the day of judgment. the only silver lining is at least their parents won't suffer years on end from the gulf war syndrome symptoms depleted uranium will most likely casue them. Over 67% of first gulf war vets have kids with serious birth defects like missing eyes and limbs and over 13,000 have died from illnesses and injuries. Well, over 50% are on diability. The use of
DU has been increased several times. These parents will be spared these heartaches...though I know they would prefer to suffer than have their children suffer if they could.
2006-10-31 16:39:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Iraq was never linked to 9/11 by any republicans.
Rumsfeld has even said strait out that Saddam had no connection to 9/11.
The reason we attacked Iraq was that Iraq had 2 terrorist training camps in its territory, and we were worried that Saddam would give them chemical weapons to use against the US, since he is the only ruler alive to have used them.
It turned out that saddam moved the weapons out of country, At least according to General Al Sada, saddam's supreme commander.
2006-10-31 15:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by Doggzilla 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Bin Laden is a CIA asset and a patsy. 9/11 is an inside job. The facts are out and if the research is done it is nearly impssible to believe otherwise.
ps. I have read the Popular Mechanics and NIST reports as well as the 9/11 commision report. All are laughable and erroneous for hundreds of reasons.
If we want to get out of Iraq, exposing 9/11 truth may be the only way to do this. It is still the mother of all issues.
2006-10-31 16:26:42 · answer #3 · answered by Luke F 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They chose of their free will to sign up. They knew the risks. We all know that Iraq did not attack us on 9-11. What you do not mention is why we had to take Saddam out. Here is a summation of what Bush said during the address. This is never mentioned by anti war people, yet it was said on national tv.
1. We defeated Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War.
2. By doing so, we have the right to dictate the terms of his surrender.
3. Since we were the stronger power, what we say goes.
4. Part of that agreement was Saddam was to allow UN weapon inspectors unfettered access.
5. Saddam refused to honor this part of the agreement.
6. Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds in the North.
7. Since Saddam breached the contract, we did not have to honor ours.
8. War is on, we finished the job.
2006-10-31 15:07:05 · answer #4 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋
I am so sick of this. No one in the administration ever said that Saddam was responsible for 9-11. The Left made that up as an excuse to attack those who wanted to remove Saddam from power.
2006-10-31 15:22:14 · answer #5 · answered by The One True Chris 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Little girls and little boys were losing their moms and dads in Iraq long before the U.S. sent its military in. Saddam was torturing and killing his own countrymen, the moms and dads of little Iraqi boys and girls. This reign of horror went on for years and years and years...
Yeah, what Jay said.
2006-10-31 15:41:21 · answer #6 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because their mommies and daddy's think they're fighting to defend their American freedoms, when, in truth, they're fighting for the corporate interests that support and govern their country by proxy through the president. Because their mommies and daddies need their government to tell them what to think, how to behave, and what to do (go to another country and kill poor people). The longer they stay in Iraq, the more hostility Iraqis will have towards them. If you were an Iraqi man/woman and your family/children were killed in the name of 'American freedom'...would you say thank you'? No, you would most likely lose your faith in God, and become so sad and enraged at the foreign occupants that you would want to kill as many Americans as possible. The longer the mommies and daddies are in Iraq...the greater the chance they have of dying. And it is their choice to die, for the phony pretext of freedom in which they believe ...when all that's really important is controlling the oil.
2006-10-31 15:40:17 · answer #7 · answered by Happier in China 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I am sorry to tell you this but a lot of the soldiars dying in Iraq for bush ARE just little boys and girls. everything is relative. you may have noticed that Bushs little girls are not over there.
2006-10-31 17:51:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Saddam was well known for supporting suicide bombers in the Middle East. It was a good idea to get rid of him because he would have caused all kind of mischief, it would have been worse than it is now. Saddam hates the USA because they kicked his butt in 1991. If you don't think that he would have hesitated to seize the opportunity for revenge while we were fighting the war on terror, I have a bridge to sell you.
2006-10-31 15:10:54 · answer #9 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Why did my sister have to die when she was sent to war in Iraq?
2006-10-31 17:35:54 · answer #10 · answered by High-strung Guitarist 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋