science and religion question... it has to do with the creation of our universe...?

Question

As I was reading special theory of relativity and general theory of relativity, I found out something very interesting which said that at the beginning of our universe, the universe was concentrated in a point called singularity where the laws of physics do not apply...
Now it has been proven that the universe is expanding... therefore giving support to the big bang theory...

Well in that point of space and time called singularity the laws of physics do not apply.. Then what made it burst into the huge big bang if there was nothing outside and in the inside the laws were not comprehensible then what made it burst into a huge explosion?... scientist say that only a supernatural power could have been the reason for such expansion... God? Think about it....

Sometimes science makes me reflex about my beliefs (religion) positively or negatively but this time is positively.

Answer 1

yea, this is not new. It is called the 'first cause theory' and was made by St. Thomas Aquinas during renaissance-ish time period. It states that Logic AND faith are acceptable and he proved it the same way you did. He said science of how earth was created is fine and having faith is fine too. Eventually, as you go down the long chain of events like earth is due to big bang, big bang is due to condensed matter, etc etc, then eventually as you go down the line, there has to be an "uncaused cause"

Its a cool idea though. My favorite quote is "Man discovers what God created"

Answer 2

First off, I am not completely sure whether the universe and life have natural or supernatural beginnings.

On the "Theory" of Cosmic Evolution, from a strictly scientific viewpoint, the energy contained within the singularity had to have had a beginning (try to prove that it didn't by finding one thing that you can confirm had no beginning. stumped?). So the question follows, Where did it come from? It can't have spontaneously generated itself (huge violation of the law of conservation of energy, and even if there were no laws then, where did the laws come from?).

On the "Theory" of Natural Evolution, the chances of a random chemical reaction forming even the most basic building blocks of life is a mathematical impossibility. The chances of that happening multiple times, close enough together in time and space, to form increasingly more complex building blocks is way beyond impossibility. The chances that a single living cell would ever be formed are WAY beyond being beyond impossibility. The chances of the random evolution starting at atoms and going up to humans require numbers humanity has never counted to (and we've counted some big numbers). I think I would prefer one scientific impossibility in an infinite God to an infinite number of impossibilities in evolution.

Answer 3

What the hell are you smoking? Scientists have never said anything about "supernatural powers", stop making things up. When people claim that god caused the big bang, I always ask this question, where did god come from? You have no real answer for that, do you?
Stop trying to incorporate your religious beliefs into science, just like all other Christians. No scientist believes in a god that way you do. To a scientist god is the natural harmony of the universe, not some super huge, super powerful man that somehow has no begining or end and concerns himself with the affairs of humans.

Answer 4

Someone posted: "where did god come from? You have no real answer for that, do you?"

Something must have the power of being within itself (self-existence or aseity) or nothing would or could possibly exist.
If something exists, something somehow, somewhere, at some time has the power of being intrinsically. It is not an effect. The only possible logical alternative to a First Cause is No Cause. An infinite series of finite causes merely confuses the issue by raising the problem of self-causation to the infinite level of absurdity.
The rational alternative of No Cause is possible only if we eliminate the “if” from the premise “If something exists … ” If there is no cause for the world, then only two possibilities remain: Either there is no universe, or the universe is self-existent and eternal.

Answer 5

No, scientists do NOT say that there must be a supernatural cause for the big bang - I study cosmology, you can take my word for this. Science studies the natural causes of things, and thus has nothing to say on the supernatural (gods).

We have found a natural cause for everything - and someday we will find the natural cause for the big bang. There are many theories out there that need to be tested, and many ways to test them coming up with new instruments. Stay tuned for an answer.

Answer 6

That's a question involving several threoretical physists today. The best explantion I've heard so far is that the fabric of space is energy and what happened was space collapsed from a time ripple forming it into a singularity. Only problem, is there is no way to prove it.

Answer 7

Yes, an extremely highly advanced civilization or entity could theoretically harness the amount of power needed to create a Big Bang like event. It's not necessarily the only possibility, but it is a possibility.

Answer 8

there's a flaw in Hawking's logic. A one hundred% appropriate introduction may well be finished in itself, artwork by skill of itself, have its very own rules, and can require no intervention. in basic terms because of the fact somebody can clarify the universe with out invoking God would not advise God would not exist. it relatively is one reason I relatively have little or no know for 'scientists" including Hawking. you could no longer disprove or tutor God. maximum scientists comprehend that, so i'm uncertain why Hawking thinks his critiques are something extra desirable than in basic terms..critiques. i'm SAM- that's no longer actual in any respect. i'm a Christian and that i like technology. the two my mom and dad are scientists and are additionally Christians. I relatively have by no skill had a difficulty with evolution or the great bang. in case you think of the small group that promotes a strict interpretation of Genesis represents all Christians, you have plenty to verify. Oh, and Christians who have self belief that think of the international is 6,000 years previous, no longer 4.000. Sheesh can no longer even get that good.

Answer 9

Religion has nothing to do with it.
After the event, when the universe and man were chaosed upon, man in his own mind decided that in order to keep the rest of the people in line they had to create a god in order for them to create and control the sheep.
The universe is ruled by chaos and no matter what any man can say will change that.
It's up to the individual to decide whether or not to become one of the sheep or be a random radical it the grand scheme of things (of which, man, has no say).

Answer 10

I believe that science and religion are one. I know that sounds weird, but if you think of Darwin's Theory, isn't it natural (or God driven) that we evolve? God created the Earth, but how? Why not from erupting volcanos, water, lightning, etc.. And why not evolve plants, animals and humans? He had to create us from something - I believe that Science and God are so intertwined, and we just need to understand that that may be the way God does things. After all, we did not know that germs existed 150 years ago simple because we couldn't see them, but they were there. Same could be said about the laws of nature and the parts of the universe that physics do not apply.