Nope you're both wrong and if he wasn't hurt right now, Oklahoma's Adrian Peterson would be the best running back in college now.
2006-10-31 13:30:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Chaotic Darkness 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Naw I think its Marshall Faulk for the Aztecs, he was really the first to exel in both running and receiving. He was a way better receiver than Reggie Bush, and he definetly ran with more power.
2006-10-31 21:33:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
IF we're Talking about ALL TIME... Barry, Adrian, Reggie and everyone else bows to Archie Griffin
2006-10-31 23:34:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
DeAngelo Williams
2006-10-31 21:45:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by ... 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barry Sanders, Oklahoma State was the best running back in college history.
2006-10-31 22:28:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by PS 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, reggie was good because he was fast, and he broke tackles.
2006-10-31 21:36:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by mac_byaah 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope. common reason was he in on that 4th down play during the title game against teaxs? nope lendel white was
2006-10-31 21:26:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by red sox! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep! And the highest paid too!
2006-10-31 21:33:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by tim b 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would have to say hes probably one of the most exciting to watch tho.
2006-11-01 01:56:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nickname here 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
deffinetly and if any one thinks he wasn't than the NFL thinks he will be better in the NFL than any other RB
2006-10-31 21:54:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by John 3
·
0⤊
0⤋