why were books burned instead of torn up or thrown away?

Answer 1

dramatic effect.

Answer 2

Books that are torn -> can be pieced together
Books that are thrown away -> can be found in a dump
Books that are burned -> can't be, not to mention its quite an exclamatory statement(like someone saying "This book is not something that should be read by anyone and never will be!!")

Answer 3

Who would not like a sturdy hearth? maximum probable it started with clay pills in Ur approximately 2 minutes after somebody wrote approximately Gilgamesh being a donkeyhead, different than it would have been e book breaking. you hit upon e book burning international, oftentimes executed by capacity of those in at present in capacity. Books are propaganda, by capacity of any call. The chinese language dynasties have been nicely-enjoyed for it, yet you would be no longer common pressed to hit upon a rustic, faith, or subculture that hasn't executed it. Burn each and all of the books declaring every physique else ever being on top of issues, finally people forget there replaced into every physique yet you to be in value.

Answer 4

It's symbolic of destroying not just the physical, tangible book but of the destruction of the content.
Fire was thought to be purifying, so it was also a way of cleansing the "dirtiness" out of the area infected by the book's content.

Answer 5

For the symbolic impact...nothing left but ashes. Also, the book-burners thought the books were evil -- which makes the book-burning similar to the witch-burnings in other eras.

Answer 6

Because it's like the all time dis to an author.

Answer 7

burning is more dramatic not to add more final!

Answer 8

There weren't shredders in those days. Fire is less work.

Answer 9

Because they were dirty books.