He's a US senator and he basically called the US military a bunch of idiots? And thats not treasonous? Thats not emboldening the enemy? Or demoralizing the US military? Wow.
2006-10-31 10:11:25 · 14 answers · asked by MackDaddy10 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Listen to what he said!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLuMWiQ6r2o
2006-10-31 10:16:55 · update #1
Nope.
2006-10-31 10:12:57 · answer #1 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
YES!!!! He should be imprisoned for TREASON during the
Vietnam War for going to Paris in 1971 and 1972 while still with the US Naval reserves and having meetings with the North Vietnamese delegation to help end the war while there were still
american troops still fighting the VC and the North Vietnamese,
and also while there were still POWs being held in Hanoi and elsewhere in North Vietnam. He is a MF Communist and his picture hangs on the wall in a war museum in Hanoi and in
Saigon. Hanoi John Kerry and Hanoi Jane Fonda should both be in Prison. BTW, I was in Vietnam when this SOB was lying to
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1971 calling me and every man and women who were there baby killers, war criminals and all of this other untruthful BS that he was spewing out of his filthy mouth. Good people died when that SOB lied.
He should be IMPEACHED NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-31 10:25:34 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He's basing his opinion on ACTUALLY HAVING BEEN IN A WAR. It's not treasonous to say that a group is unprepared. The US military was demoralized when they were sent over on a lie, and to make money for Cheney.
2006-10-31 10:15:31 · answer #3 · answered by Luken 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
True.. Not prudent.
But come on, we all know that the military *is* the last choice available for many young people who do not do well in school, or even socially.
It is no insult, the military advertises parents considering letting the kids join the military after looking around and seeing gangs and pregnant kids
2006-10-31 10:30:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, Kerry meant to slam Bush and it came off wrong. I can't see Kerry deliberately slamming the military. If there was a law against things said that came off the wrong way, we'd all be in jail as I'm sure everyone has had that happen to them at some point.
2006-10-31 10:14:00 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He didn't criticize the troops at all, he criticized the morons who sent them to Iraq. I think the RICO statutes should be used against everybody who supported Bush, sieze all their assets and apply it to the trillion dollar debt he ran up to Communist China, there's no reason why innocent Americans should have to pay for the mistakes made by the evil people who supported Bush. Let them put their money where their mouths are!
2006-10-31 10:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kerry's treason never ends. It stated with his own fellow soldiers that he betrayed in Nam.
Hillary, who supports Bush in Iraq, will finally end Kerry's treason when she stomps him in the dirt, in the 2008 Democrat Primary.
2006-10-31 10:15:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
under ww2 military law.he is 100% guilty of treason for such remarks,given his position of power. the Germans would have him shot,or convinced to take the poison .yes i do think he should be arrested .good day
2006-10-31 10:16:39 · answer #8 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope he was calling the administration idiots and not the troops but you rather be needlessly angry than think. That is cool that is what Yahoo Answers if for.
2006-10-31 10:14:53 · answer #9 · answered by Rod is the coolest guy I know 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
he was referring to Bush...the idiots are the ones who can't or will not see this.
2006-10-31 10:13:22 · answer #10 · answered by dstr 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋