2006-10-31 06:26:15 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not banned, but controlled.
The airways belong to the people, NOT corporate America. Commercial radio and television networks should be required to grant sufficient time for bona fide candidates to present their issues and to respond to their opponents. Funding for commercials, as well as other campaigning expenses, should be controlled. Otherwise, there will always be a definite advantage for the wealthy over all others (that's been true ever since Kennedy dollars defeated Hubert Humphrey in the primaries of 1960), and/or there will be a definite advantage for those who garner support from the wealthy, for example through K Street lobbyists.
In my opinion, we should vote for no one for public office who does not promise to work on bipartisan efforts to reform campaign financing and elections.
2006-10-31 06:37:15 · answer #1 · answered by bfrank 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I observed this advert in question and it replaced into certainly very racy. the line on the subject of the female "screwing herself with broccoli" is not any exaggeration. They then say that examine teach that vegetarians have extra helpful intercourse. in spite of the indisputable fact that, they fail to point who did this study. Peta probable did it themselves (if in any respect). in addition they forget that there is not any thank you to degree that. it incredibly is quite subjective. they are claiming an unmeasurable opinion as actuality. Then the Peta rep is going to guard the advert by capacity of making a gross generalization approximately non-vegetarian ingredients. i've got have been given no problems with vegetarians. in spite of the indisputable fact that, I do have a substantial pink meat (get it) with Peta. in assessment to maximum vegetarians I even have come throughout the time of, they are demeaning to those who % to consume meat and severe in the two approaches and concepts. i think of Peta is an extremist team. And in basic terms like Eener31 pronounced, i think of it incredibly is hypocritical that Peta fights for the rights of animals on a similar time as forgetting human rights (incredibly degrading women persons).
2016-10-21 01:26:53 · answer #2 · answered by daw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The First Amendment right to freedom of expression applies to the ability to purchase commercial time.
2006-10-31 06:27:50 · answer #3 · answered by texascrazyhorse 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, why can't people campaign for themselves and show what they support. If candidates cannot handle the mudslinging, they're in the wrong career
2006-10-31 06:27:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
That wouldn't hurt anyone's feelings. All they do is get the names out into the public, but really serve no other purpose.
2006-10-31 06:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by sethle99 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wouldn't that be wonderful !!
No more voting based on sound bites.
2006-10-31 06:30:14 · answer #6 · answered by Sean 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
most of them yeah... they're so ridiculous... the candidates are acting like little kids and picking on each other... they make politics and politicians look so stupid...
2006-10-31 06:29:13 · answer #7 · answered by ILuvMe 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know but I can tell you I will be glad when the election is over I am tired of all of them.
2006-10-31 06:27:44 · answer #8 · answered by elainecynthia 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
YES
2006-10-31 06:27:33 · answer #9 · answered by smitty 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES YES YES!!!!
2006-10-31 06:27:37 · answer #10 · answered by Lady Scientist 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋