SO IN MY LAST QUESTION..MANY REPLIED BY SAYING THAT QUEEN OR ROYAL FAMILY ..IS JUST A FIGURE HEAD..WITH NO REAL POWERS..
BUT MY POINT IS ..WATEVER MAY BE THE REASON..WHY MONARCHY??WHY HEIRARCHY RULE??..WAT THEY HAVE WICH AN ORDINATY BRIT DONT??
A PRESIDENT IN A DEMOCRACY IS ALSO A NOMINAL HEAD..BUT CHOSEN FROM PPL..ON BASIS OF HIS WORK..NOT ON BASIS OF HIS BIRTH....
POINT ABT THAT ATTRACTS TOURISM...U REALLY DONT NEED TO MAKE QUEEN THE HEAD OF COUNTRY...TO HER BEING THE ATTRACTION..SE WILL BE EVEN WITHOUT IT....PALACES IN INDIA ARE..WITH NO KINGS..
ABT HOW GREAT THE ROYAL FAMILY IS..
LET ME SAY SOMETHING...PRINCE CHARLES BETRAYED HIS WIFE....PRINCESS DIANA....ROYAL FAMILY KNEW ABT THE AFFAIR WITH CAMILLA..THE QUEEN DID ..STILL THEY SPOILED HER LIFE..
RECENLTY ONE OF UR PRINNCE MAY BE HARRY WAS WEARING A NAZI DRESS..DISGUISING AS HITLER--THE MAN WHO ATTACHED UR COUNTRY.
NOW THATS UR FUTURE RULERS.....AND THEIR RESPECT FOR UR SENTIMENTS..
ABT CAPS AND SPELNGS..I KNOW IT.U JST ANS
2006-10-31 06:12:32 · 7 answers · asked by METICULOUS 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
you are right and thats what goes in the mind of most pple. why monarchy...?? the brits look stupid with that. they need to move ahead.
2006-11-03 08:35:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Someone who puts so little effort into writing a coherent question doesn't deserve much of an answer. But what do you mean by a 'colonial' mindset? This would only apply in ex-colonies like Canada and Australia which have kept the monarchy. The British monarchy was around long before Britain had an empire, and means much more to people than a symbol of an empire.
As for presidents not being chosen on the basis of their birth, do you really think someone of GW Bush's limited abilities would be doing anything more than propping up a bar somewhere in Texas were it not for who his father was?
2006-10-31 09:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is sick at Harry wore a Nazi outfit. He should have thought about that. I am sure he isn't for Fascism or anything. He was probably just trying to be funny.
And a lot of people did not find that humourous. Especially the Jews.
Royalty is just here for tradition. I am certain it is NOT going to last forever. Maybe we should appreciate while it lasts. Because probably in 200 or more years ( maybe even 100 ) we will not have the royals.
Maybe that is a good thing. I don't know.
2006-10-31 11:33:37 · answer #3 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course she is a symbol of colonialism and a lot more isms besides. Trouble is few seem to appreciate the bloody and disreputable past on which she rests. No one in their right mind could be proud of Monarchies 'achivements'. It is a sad indictment that so many Brits are uneducated. Institutionalised racism starts with the Monarchy.
2006-10-31 06:59:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'm no monarchist .but think of the alternative [a president ] we could end up with another bush
no thanks lets keep the monarchy
2006-11-04 04:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by gwaz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That isn't a question, that is a rant. Try sorting out your own country first.
2006-10-31 06:16:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
2006-10-31 06:23:22 · answer #7 · answered by lottyjoy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋