and it is a womans choice to let it turn into a baby, or to remove it, why should a man be held responsible for the woman choosing to have a baby?
This is your logic, prochoicers. You all said/ believe the above.
2006-10-31 05:32:15 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
---
how long before someone says "it takes 2", or "he made it, he should deal with it", or another similar answer, completely ignoring the logic that I took from the pro choice crowd?
2006-10-31 05:33:12 · update #1
(((it took 5 mins)))
2006-10-31 05:41:52 · update #2
Because once that choice is made, the father should be a man and be responsible once the child is born.
2006-10-31 05:37:58 · answer #1 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, the fact that it will become a living breathing person just seems to elude some people. It's no different than having a person in an intensive care unit for 9 months. They are able to then leave and live a life. But a fetus can't make that choice, it's the choice of it's "intensive care unit" mother to make that chioce? It makes no sense.
2006-10-31 05:40:09 · answer #2 · answered by sethle99 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i feel that is both of the mother and father's resposibility once the child is born to care for this child. I never have thought abortion was an option for me. I was a single mom at the age of 21 yr. old. It was the best choice that i could have made. my daughter is a beautiful almost 7 yr old and i also have a son who is a wonderful almost 5 yr old. they are great kids.
2006-10-31 07:26:24 · answer #3 · answered by babygirl_mnml 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The father is responsible to the child, not the mohter. That all starts once the person is born. That's entirely consistent with the pro-choice view that the full personhood rights begin a birth.
2006-10-31 05:36:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
getting pregnant is different from carrying a full term fetus. Anyhow, why are you so upset about this? Did you get denied at the adoption center? And many men aren't held accountable for their babies. Just look at welfare. But I'm glad you brought it up...when no more men leave the mothers and babies behind, and it is ILLEGAL for a man to leave a pregnant woman, then we can talk about responsibility, 'kay?
2006-10-31 05:40:08 · answer #5 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm with ya, it is the woman who has choice.
choice to spread her legs
choice to let me not use protection
choice to abort or keep the rugrat
Best thing is to paint her as an unfit mom and get full custody of the kid. Then make her pay you childsupport.
2006-10-31 05:43:00 · answer #6 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A man shouldn't be held responsible for that decision. Do you think he should? I'm not quite sure what you're trying to prove here.
2006-10-31 05:38:45 · answer #7 · answered by τεκνον θεου 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are a control freak. If you could get pregnant you would never allow the right to abortion be taken from you.
Religous zealots make lousy dostors.
The logic beats you defending some crap by a preacher who just wants your money!
2006-10-31 05:35:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I just wish every person that is pro choice....that their parents would have been pro choice with them
2006-10-31 05:34:47 · answer #9 · answered by John 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If you have double cell than you have a baby, If you have not double cell than you don't have a baby
2006-10-31 05:37:24 · answer #10 · answered by sisa 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋