NAMBLA is the North American Man Boy Love Association.
Nancy Pelosi is the house democratic leader.
WTF IS WRONG WITH DEMOCRATS
2006-10-31 04:51:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
you support NAMBLA
2006-10-31 04:59:34 · answer #1 · answered by anonymous 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
See Yahoo Internet under "Pelosi support for NAMBLA". The American Spectator and the Patriot Post both state that Pelosi marched in the 2001 Gay Pride in San Francisco, 3 spots away from Harry Hay. Pretty obvious support, or at least playing to the vastly gay community in San Francisco. Hillary evidently supports NAMBLA as well.
2006-10-31 05:14:12 · answer #2 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm a staunch conservative and dislike Pelosi very much, but I've seen no proof to support your assertion.
Yes, she marched in a Homsexual Pride parade in San Francisco and, yes, there were some NAMBLAs marching, but that hardly means she supports the pedophiles.
Unless you have actual evidence where she comes out in support of them, I'd ask you to stick with the facts.
Surely there are many other issues with Pelosi you could rightfully and justifiably attack.
2006-10-31 04:59:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
LOOKEE HERE::::::::::Pelosi voted three times to make a convicted page sexual predator,
former Congressman Gerry Studds (D-Mass.), chair of a congressional committee.
In 1990, Pelosi voted against censuring Barney Frank for having his live-in boyfriend
run a prostitution ring from Frank's apartment.
Pelosi raised no objections when Clinton pardoned Democrat Congressman Mel Reynolds (Ill.)
who had been convicted of felonies for having had sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker.
The historic Nancy Pelosi is an authentic representative of San Francisco liberal values and hardly
has the record to lecture anyone on cleaning up the Congress.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::
2006-10-31 05:03:40 · answer #4 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You have no proof, so currently we have just as much reason to believe YOU are a NAMBLA supporter. Also the current Republican speaker doesn't need a NAMBLA card, he already has protected a child sex predator and told him to "please run again" even after he knew of his sick preferences.
2006-10-31 05:02:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh, Puh-Leese. Are you that desperate? If anyone supports NAMBLA it would be Mark Foley and the current Speaker who protected him, Dumb as a Wedge of Cheese Denny Hastert.
You must be scared to death if you are resorting to such low down lies.
2006-10-31 05:00:33 · answer #6 · answered by notyou311 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I did and I bet most Democrats do too. They'll just dismiss it as they do most truths as being inconsequential or a lie or bring up Foley. That's all they have. See? What did I say? Do I know them or what? They are sooo predictable! Nonetheless, who wouldn't support men having sex with little boys, right? Sick! Sick! Sick!
2006-10-31 04:56:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
YES, it is true. Please don't forget where her support comes from. She's a san Franciscan through and through. She believes that even groups like NAMBLA have the right to exist. This is nothing new. It's jsy as bad as the war coward John Kerry telling students that the soldiers are stupid. How can anyone vote for these cretins? They are beneith contempt.
2006-10-31 05:01:13 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Spreading lies again Neo-Con(vict)? That is not very Christian is it? You better zip up your hypocrisy is showing!
I guess if you have nothing to say on the issues than lie, right?
2006-10-31 05:20:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
WOW. Do you seriously find that to be true? I mean... yeah Pelosi is pretty freakish and ugly but come on. Is that how you tell yourself that democrats are evil?
How pathetic!
2006-10-31 04:53:45 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋