English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

I think it was a personal opinion on what each man believed in, which helped shape their reconstruction pollicy. I think Andrew
Johnson was more opportunistic than Lincoln. He did whatever it took to get the job, and shaped his policies around this.

President Abraham Lincoln was the leader of the moderate Republicans and wanted to speed up Reconstruction and reunite the nation as soon as possible. Lincoln supported voting rights for black veterans of the United States Colored Troops (USCT).
However, the opposing faction of Radical Republicans were much more skeptical of southern intentions and demanded far more stringent federal action. Congressman Thaddeus Stevens and Senator Charles Sumner led the Radical Republicans. Radical Republicans staunchly opposed Lincoln's Ten percent plan. After Lincoln's assassination, President Andrew Johnson switched from the Radical to the moderate camp. He too favored voting rights for veterans of the United States Colored Troops. By 1866, however, Johnson, with no party affiliation, broke with the moderate Republicans and aligned himself more with the Democrats who opposed equality and the Fourteenth Amendment. Radicals attacked the policies of Johnson, especially his veto of the Civil Rights Bill for the Freedmen.

2006-10-31 04:54:05 · answer #1 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 0 0

The probably answer is selection # 2. The assassination of Lincoln relatively made Johnson's lenient coverage untenable, with maximum cabinet contributors and congress against Johnson who replaced into :a million) a Southerner 2) a Democrat, hated by skill of Southerners as turncoat and northerners as too lenient. Johnson survived impeachment by skill of one vote. on the different hand: Lincoln might have been far extra valuable in reconciliation. He gave of course an illustration of his intentions on the Gettysburg handle, the place we tacitly praised the attempt of the two components. Lincoln might have sought the help of Robert E. Lee between many others to heal and fix citizenship interior a short quantity of time. regrettably for the U. S., the novel republicans, took harsh measures against their southern brethren, which made nefarious businesses such because of the fact the Klan or the Jim Crow rules to proliferate. The accomplice states might have favourite to be left on my own, particularly than have governments appointed by skill of the North, and actually weren't desirous to be a area of the hated Union. Lincoln's assassination worked generally against the South, created suspicion and worry and not on time the therapeutic of the wounded divided u . s ..

2016-11-26 20:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers