Metallica died when they wrote the black album.
U2 haven't written a SINGLE SONG worth hearing since Rattle & Hum.
R.E.M. haven't written anything halfway decent since whatever album "Losing my religion" was on.
Radiohead disappeared up their own arses after "The Bends" (OK Computer wasn't great, admit it).
The Chilli Peppers have just been rehashing their first album over and over again.
Has there been a SINGLE band that managed to stay true to their own tastes after getting money?
(PS I'm talking about bands, not solo artists)
2006-10-31 03:37:49 · 22 answers · asked by people are scum 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Okay, let's put a stop to this right now. The Beatles sucked even before they became famous. True, they sucked more afterwards, but they sucked either way.
2006-10-31 03:41:24 · update #1
I agree
I am this close (pinching fingers closely together) to going on a full blown rant about all the bands you have just mentioned...
U2, R.E.M., Radiohead and now fu*kcing coldplay are the most annoying bands ever in the history of ever.
True fact....I hate them all, hate hate HATE
2006-10-31 03:43:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tool. 10,000 Days and Lateralus were both amazing albums. They both came after Tool hit it big with Aenima. I can't think of a better drummer than Danny Carey. MAYBE Mike Portnoy.
I would also say Clutch, although I don't know if they're big enough to qualify for your question. I liked their newest album, Robot Hive Exodus, a lot.
Metallica got big with their early records, but I think the black album is their best album. Everything since has sucked though.
EDIT: I agree with you. The Beatles were overrated and started the "pop" trend which is a horrible, horrible vein of music. They had a few songs that were alright, but nothing to deserve the credit they get.
EDIT 2: I'm laughing at the guy that said to read Rolling Stone magazine to get a clue. Idiot. Try going to music school instead.
2006-10-31 03:42:04 · answer #2 · answered by robtheman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles
2006-10-31 03:38:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Red Hot Chili Peppers
2006-10-31 03:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by robin dupree 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've got continuously pronounced Rolling Stone rap examine are a shaggy canines tale. oftentimes using actuality that the persons who do the reviewing are over privileged white boys who pay attention to sh*t like Of Montreal and that pseudo indie rock bullsh*t all day. as a effect the severe score of the Carter III (its been scientifically shown that maximum persons of Waynes fanbase at this factor are white boys, a million/2 of whom are over privileged). The kicker is, Rolling Stone will return and re value rap albums after magazines that have on the least some rap information provides them their deserved place in musical background
2016-10-21 01:20:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles.
2006-10-31 03:40:04 · answer #6 · answered by texascrazyhorse 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
AC/DC
Aerosmith
There are fewer who do good albums after the money than before because of a simple theory.
Most artists...what music guys are....are more creative and do their best work when they are broke, down and out, etc.
I myself am a web designer and it applies with me as well. Some of my best sites were created when I was low on cash, looking for work hard, etc. More passion is put into projects when you are down n out.
Money makes most lazy.
2006-10-31 03:41:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles made plenty of great albums after the got RICH
2006-10-31 03:41:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Led Zeppelin
2006-10-31 03:39:41 · answer #9 · answered by Diesel Weasel 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Darkness
2006-10-31 03:40:37 · answer #10 · answered by Clayton B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋