Al Gore, on his visit to Finland said that the Kyoto-Agreement will be adopted by the next administration regardless of which party it'll be.
Does this mean that this is a non-issue in elections? Seems like the only reason why it isn't adopted in the US right now is because of the current president/administration. I seem to recall that it was turned down because it would be "too costly"- but apparantly it wont be too costly to the new administration.
Or is this whistful thinking on Gore's part? A political lie in order to get everyone else into line behind the Kyoto agreement- like China and India who haven't joined because the biggest "polluter", the US, hasn't joined?
2006-10-31
01:21:34
·
4 answers
·
asked by
dane
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections