i think she should just get £10,000. then get devorsed and then that should be the end of it.
2006-10-31 01:12:19 · 58 answers · asked by jimbo_28_02 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Its getting sordid now..wouldn't give the gold digging harridan a penny...
2006-10-31 02:04:33 · answer #1 · answered by geordie.lady 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing worse than a celebrity divorce.
I can't believe Heather Mills is being so greedy.Paul McCartney made his money long before she came along,so what gives her the right to demand any of it?
A single piece of paper called a marriage certificate.It can make a woman,a money grabbing b***h,or a man a right b*****d.
There is a very old saying,
"What's yours,is mine,
What's mine,is mine.
Heather Mills certainly knows that one,and she's playing for everything.
I hope Paul McCartney,tells her to take a hike.She's got plenty of her own,so why is she taking his.(take a look above,and it'll give you the answer)
2006-10-31 02:03:50 · answer #2 · answered by nicky dakiamadnat600bugmunchsqig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Linda's father didn't own Kodak as one person answered. Her father was an attorney and not affiliated with the Eastman-Kodak fortune. Linda was a photographer but that's her only connection to cameras and film. As to the question, there's a vast fortune, no prenup and a child involved here. This divorce will be drawn out. I'm sure Paul would love nothing more than to move on.
2006-10-31 01:51:40 · answer #3 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing I care LESS about. Somehow, my own affairs interest me more, it only always amazes me how English people can't get over somebody's first wife dying and somebody marrying another woman. The same with Prince Charles and Camilla. That Heather is a gold digger or not is a different thing.
2006-10-31 02:51:58 · answer #4 · answered by La 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think anyone is on her side and I also think that no one is believing this whole "he also did this to Linda" stuff that's now appearing from what she's been saying.
Linda's father was/is a very wealthy guy and owned Kodak so I can't really see her staying with Paul as she had her own money etc etc.
If it was me I'd give Heather Mills a right slap and say you get nothing.
2006-10-31 01:16:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I totally agree. She playing this all out abit to much. That's what she wants to make a big thing about it all. Because she knows her Carree is over. So shes having to make the most of all the press attention as she can!
That's why I think this is all going on and on. Some very clever publicity from her management.
2006-10-31 01:17:10 · answer #6 · answered by Dominique C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she should get naff all. All this time Paul's daughter Stella has been saying she is a money grabbing B**ch and she has been proved right. That Heather "please have sympathy for me I am so desperate and pathetic" Mills McCartney should just accept that her black widow scheme failed and walk away. The only person who should benefit financially is their daughter.
2006-10-31 02:18:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. Just give her a little bit, give him joint custody of their daughter, and then have him move on. Maybe this will be his last marriage. Have him be alone for a while and do a Clooney: just date the women, do not marry them. I mean, after all these years, he should just be a happy bachelor who is a father of three.
I know one thing-no one, but only a few-likes Heather. They think she should get her scraps and be out the door.
2006-10-31 02:13:17 · answer #8 · answered by uchaboo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, 99% of people just couldn't care a less, i know i don't. But considering he is worth a ridiculous amount of money like £800 million i think 10 grand may be taking the mickey a bit!
2006-10-31 03:41:41 · answer #9 · answered by Rachel 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A journalist recently asked Paul McCartney would he ever go down on one knee again, after all this horrible business. McCartney replied: 'I'd rather you referred to her as Heather'...
2006-10-31 01:15:35 · answer #10 · answered by ralph d 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
as i have been in love with paul since i was 8 years old i take an interest in it. he DIDN'T wait for me the FIRST time he got married and i was only a 13 year old crying her eyes out. years went by and i married just a regular joe shmoe and then linda died and of course i was married so my chance passed by AGAIN. he married heather and THAT marriage really threw me, WHAT did he SEE in her? (we KNOW she was seeing $$)poor paul, i think he was still mourning linda's death. and THEN they announced they seperated and i was blind sighted when MY husband announced after 25 years of marriage HE wasn't happy and wanted a divorce!! well, i think God is telling me that BOTH paul and i will be single next year......don't they say the third time is a charm?! hmmm..
2006-10-31 01:59:54 · answer #11 · answered by Sweetie 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋