Yes i agree. Reagan was the greatest President of the 20th Century. Bush is the best President we've had since Reagan. I never did like Bush Sr. he was far too liberal for my tastes. What an asshole, that Bush Sr. he renounced his NRA membership.
2006-10-30 22:25:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by college_republicans_club 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why would you say Reagan the traitor was a great president? Have you forgotten that he dealt with terrorists (after saying publicly he wouldn't) and then sold arms to our sworn enemy (which, at the time, had only recently released 52 American diplomats).
Oh yeah, and it was Mikhail Gorbachev who more than anyone was responsible for the end of the Cold War (remember Iceland summit where Gorby proposed a total drawdown on nuclear missiles and Reagan looked like a stunned deer in the headlights?).
Why don't conservatives study a little history? It's pathetic!
And Bill Clinton was easily the best president of the last 25 years of 1900s.
2006-10-31 06:59:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brendan G 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'll take the bait. Though I'm conservative, I'm under no illusion about El Presidente. There is an ocean of difference between Bush the younger and Reagan. I'm talking pacific ocean big. Reagan had a nuanced, subtle but effective foreign policy that cut the Soviets off at the knees. Bush is simply reacting to events around him with wildly varying results. Watch, after the election when James Baker introduces his plan for Iraq, it will simply be cut and run under another name. El Presidente will accept it with great enthusiasm. You heard it here first. 400 billion dollars, 3000 dead, tens of thousands wounded, for.......what? I'll say this for Bush, at least he did the right thing with appointing good judges like Roberts and Alito.
2006-10-31 06:36:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by chad 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that he is, with Bush 42 as a runner up. A better question may have been how many think that Bill Clinton was the worst President since Jimmy Carter?
2006-10-31 06:23:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
bush's low approval rating speaks for itself. reagan was not a great president by any stretch of the imagination.
The man sold deadly weapons to terrorists (Iran) and gave the money to terrorists (Contras). And then he lied about it, that's the cherry on top.
2006-10-31 06:26:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Approval ratings measure your ability to get approval ratings. The reason Clinton had high ratings is because that's what he focused on. Bush has ACTUAL work to do.
2006-10-31 06:31:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I agree...he is doing a great job in spite of the Democratic propaganda...the economy is great, and the Iraq deal is not as bad as CNN says it is.
2006-10-31 06:35:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joe 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
By far. Of course this isn't saying much.
2006-10-31 11:19:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
this has got to be a trick question.....
we are talking about Reagan and G.Bush yes???? and you want me to say something nice for both of them???
ha ha ha ha ha
2006-10-31 07:24:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by irini d 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
lets see booming economy, record stockmarket,strong military.yes he is
also slick willie the rapist is the second worst after jimmy "appeasement" carter
2006-10-31 06:27:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by glock509 6
·
3⤊
1⤋