It was written in a time when women were not even allowed to play themselves on stage, women were seen as inferior and women were 'owned' by men, and why? Because they were seen as being the weaker less intelligent gender.
Its not that it was particulary a Mysogynistic culture, but the women in all of Shakespeares plays reflected the values of society at the time.
Ophelia and Gertrude have no real Autonomy, they are at the mercy of Hamlet, Claudius, Rodrigo, and Laertes moods to define their moods, and when the men are in comflict the women suffer, anmd ultimately in the Cse of 'Hamlet' die.
I mean Hamlet is an intensely tragic play, and the women are tragic, but mostly because they are a real refelction of the time of which they are portraying!!
2006-10-30 21:30:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by catx_pye 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not sure I buy Gertrude and Ophelia are weak. Hamlet is perhaps the weakest character of all; he cannot decide what action to take. Ophelia is not weak; she is insane from grief. Women were not all weak in his plays. Regan and Goneril in King Lear or Lady Macbeth in Macbeth are certainly some of the strongest, even strident women till Edward Albee picks up the pen. Also it should not be forgotten that many of his plays were written during the reign of Queen Elizabeth. Certainly, most women were not weak. English common law actually does not debase the position of women as much as one would think from a twentieth century point of view. An unmarried woman of property could and would wield considerable influence.
2006-10-31 02:27:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by will 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think that the women in Hamlet are unique in being weak. You can look at any of Shakespeare's plays and the same is true. If they are not portrayed as weak, then they are feckless or stupid.
Perhaps it is a sign of the times in which his plays were written that a woman's place in society was subservient to a man's, no women had the right to vote, very few were ever educated and women were considered firstly the property of their father and then on marriage the property of their husband.
The only woman that I can think of in Shakespeare at the moment who was worth a pound of flesh (pardon the pun) was the one in The Merchant of Venice - can't remember her name now. Was it Portia?
2006-10-30 21:07:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Could be of three(3) reasons:
1.I think most women then were weak.
2.OR that was how Shakespeare's view on women.
3.OR he was so dominated by women that he portrayed women as "weak" as a manifestation of his wish fulfillment.
2006-10-30 23:45:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by hello 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of the characters in Hamlet are flawed. If you look closely, you could consider every character (male and female) as 'weak' in one way or another.
Shakespeare was big on flawed characters. Those "fatal flaws" are what drive his plays and make them seem human. Because everyone is flawed in one way or another, we can related to the characters well.
2006-10-30 22:10:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by bks33691 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think like the heart of the difficulty is that there seems an ongoing attempt to outline what a "genuine female" is predicated on the form of her physique. different than for the reality that this is incredibly insulting to women people at the two ends of the dimensions spectrum, it tells women people that: a million) we don't have fun selection 2) we assume them to conform to three sort of preconceived concept approximately what the international/media/adult men discover eye-catching 3) Worst of all, we basically care what they appear as if. for my area i'm an American and function been bored to death for an prolonged time. i'm 30 and that i undergo in concepts being approximately 10 years previous while this question approximately what's "known" for a female's length began transforming into a media difficulty. appears like the consensus has consistently been that an known female is between length 10 - sixteen. i've got not got any opinion on those sizes, and that i do no longer know who desperate that it replaced into known, yet all i can assert is that i know a great sort of ladies people munch greater and lots smaller. What all of this serves to do is make women people resent one yet another for what they think of the different is secretly saying/questioning with regard to the others physique. this is this style of private element, why ought to we be worried that our very DNA is offending somebody? Or, why ought to they should undergo people believing that something is "incorrect" with them. Plus people inspect you sideways once you benefit or drop some pounds. speaking from own journey, I lost approximately 40 lbs interior the final 3 years, went from a length 10 to length 4. i'm a healthful weight for my height and am at a healthful BMI. i'm no longer underweight or obese medically. in spite of the undeniable fact that, i've got gained no longer something yet "difficulty" approximately me new smaller physique. i replaced into even advised that I "do in basic terms no longer appear as if myself". as though every person else can tell me what i'm meant to look like. Like i'm meant to have 30 or 40 lbs of extra fat to be popular. i do no longer % to income what i'm meant to look like and that i do no longer know the different female who does.
2016-11-26 20:31:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by acebedo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the era that hamlet was written it was considered that all women were weak and stupid...they were treated badly and were used for man's comfort with no thought of respect...they were considered to be second class and treated like the man wanted to treat them...........
2006-10-30 22:17:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by walterknowsall 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that Ophelia is considered weak because she fell in love!
2006-11-02 01:27:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They got womanly roles, like, I mean they got roles where women normally at like "fair ladies".
2006-10-30 22:59:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♫tweet75♫ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because shakespeare was a man
2006-11-02 04:59:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋