theory of what happen to a Black Hole when it absorbs all the matter it can hold,to the theory of Dark Matter? Could they be one in the same?
If you feel you must make a comment on my spelling and not answer my question, pleas give me the correct spelling thank you.
If you feel you must make a comment on my grammar and not answer my question pleas rewrite my question with the proper grammar thank you.
2006-10-30 20:46:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
I don't think there is any theoretical limit to the size of a black hole. However, I think what you're referring to is Hawking's restatement of his position with respect to the information paradox. In this case, he's agreeing with his critics that the information inherent in the matter absorbed by a black hole is still present in some form associated with the event horizon. The information is not lost, it is merely trapped. It re-enters the universe, albeit in a scrambled fashion, through the mechanism of Hawking radiation.
Dark Matter, on the other hand, is usually associated with particles that weakly interact via gravity with regular matter. In this case, black holes are still considered as regular matter objects. Theories have suggested neutrinos, axions and super-symmetry partners to regular matter as candidates for Dark Matter.
My opinion is that the two entities are different enought that they need to be discussed separately.
2006-11-07 12:28:12 · answer #1 · answered by eriurana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is worth understanding what could not get understood and never gets absorbed in the brain and sits on the surface like a duck sits on the water...so of you have a glass of water drink the water and don't think that duck might be there just like you cant imagine what will happen if black hole absorbs everything and doesnt give out anything. so it is also worth understanding that no importance should be given to anything that only believes in taking and not giving anything eg. black holes and politicians they are one and the same. No theory applies to them and all theories are irrational and illogical
2006-10-31 05:05:59 · answer #2 · answered by mcubea 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
about 3 to 4 years ago, 2 scientists from indian institute of science, put up theory which puts Steven Hawking's theory in a disputable position.
2006-11-04 12:12:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The parameters for the exisitance of a black hole are not compatible with a viable entity!!
2006-10-31 11:44:25 · answer #4 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋