2006-10-30 20:42:17 · 31 answers · asked by Prashant R 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Sex can be a part of love. Love domain is vast and can not be imagined.
2006-10-30 22:27:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sex is a part of love. I love all parts of sex.
2006-10-30 21:22:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love may or may not be a part of sex; and sex may or may not be a part of love. If one is married, then love should be a part of sex and sex should be a part of love. Otherwise--outside of marriage, sex and love have not much in common. In fact, there are people that I love whom I would not have sex with because I love them. Sex outside of a committed relationship (outside of marriage) may destroy love, but love never destroys sex. Sex will have it's chance at the appropriate time. Also, sex is often not patient enough (unless it is restrained) to wait on love; yet, love is always patient enough to wait on sex. In fact, where there is no patience, there is no love.
2006-10-31 01:12:53 · answer #3 · answered by bassbredrin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sex is a part of love; it's the way two partners show how much they love by expressing themselves in the only nature which was intended by God. Sex produces the couple to create one or two or more humans, showing a symbol of that love.
2006-10-30 22:45:54 · answer #4 · answered by Dimples 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the animal kingdom, sex exists without love. In the human world, love, under normal circumstances, does not exist without sex. Therefore, sex must be a part of love.
2006-10-30 21:11:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both if you're doing it right! Tee hee
I believe that sex is something beautiful to be shared with someone you love. It isn't just an act. It has meaning. It is the most intimate physical connection you can have with someone. To have someone look into your eyes and be holding you, feeling with you, inside you is the most intoxicating experience of love. When you love someone intensely you ache for them physically. You need to feel them. I'm a romantic. I don't believe in sex without love. It would cheapen the experience & the people involved. Your body is a temple. You should be careful whom you let in. :)
2006-10-31 05:19:33 · answer #6 · answered by amp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NEITHER.
One is just a biological need and the other a bit deeper bond, being emotional in manifest form, else , they call it even platonic (after the philosopher Plato).
True love is the ability of a person to evolve to a level where everything around is experienced as a part of oneself, and there fore has nothing to do with sex at all !
2006-10-31 00:10:40 · answer #7 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think sex is a part of love...many people can separate sex and love...but you can't separate love and sex...when you love someone it creates better sex...when you just have sex you miss that vital link of love...which can take it all to another level...
2006-10-30 21:29:01 · answer #8 · answered by avava9 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sex is a part of love....
U can also love a person truely without sex......but having sex without love.....thats not possible....
love is the factor that rules life...
2006-10-31 01:09:44 · answer #9 · answered by viddi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sex is the physical consummation of love. But true love can survive without sex.
2006-10-30 23:31:12 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋