They have vast empty lands with no people at all. Why can't they do this?.
2006-10-30 18:33:40 · 13 answers · asked by liketoaskq 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
How would they absorb? If it is done randomly according to the laws of osmosis, then the situation might be different. But it does not happen in case of human population. Absorption is on the basis of qualification.If half of the talented people of India migrate to these countries then India would be poorer in terms of talents and they will get richer.
2006-10-30 18:42:07 · answer #1 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Answer: Firstly, the other parts will become multi-religious, multi-linguistic and multi-racial. Secondly, after seeing the 50 % human vacated land, they will forget and override the Family Planning Rules and will produce more than dozen per couple. Thirdly, there will be a ethnic competition amongst religious, casts and races for how to increase their own population.
Again they will presume that, 50% more will be absorbed in next turn and they will go on adding. Please don't pollute the entire globe.
2006-10-31 03:06:49 · answer #2 · answered by ecsi - 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If 50% Educated people are moved to another country those countries will be more powerful and rich when remaining 50% uneducated and goondas people will fight each other and ultimately everybody will die.Then we can shift those educated people back to India then India will become Super power. Good question and is automatically forwarded to PM of India for implementation.
2006-10-31 23:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by Tony_Pdkt_TN 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's impossible. Let's assume these sovereign countries would allow this imaginary resettlement. How do we cover the costs of transportation, housing , feeding, clothing,..If we have that much fund there wouldn't be the need to resettle them. I think the main problem is not scarcity of land.
The main problems:lack of good governance and its by products such as limited education and other poor infrastructure.
2006-10-31 03:58:38 · answer #4 · answered by PAUL J 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, then their country will turned into India n India will turn Canada n australia. Believe me the world is not prepared for another "INDIA"
2006-10-31 02:41:01 · answer #5 · answered by Bunty Rocks 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
god help us,australia can well do without more immigrants that like to stay together in one area,we have that already ,with italians,greeks,lebs,vietnamese,yugo's,please no more,and for the person who said that australia is 80%dessert you are totally wrong
2006-10-31 03:29:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lalu Parshad wil be P.M.of Canada .
2006-11-02 20:46:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dear "livetoask..."
please send those 50% - ie reserved category and for heavens sake don't forget - their "dear leaders" behind in India!!!
on second thought- even if you are able to send 50% of those Leaders only , you would have done great "NATIONAL SERVICE" of the higher order than BHARAT RATNA......
pls don't leave that noble thought... pls act fast.....
many-ques!!!
( i am behind you )
2006-11-01 01:33:27 · answer #8 · answered by many-ques!!! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
after all that our population would be the same as before .
2006-11-03 09:42:21 · answer #9 · answered by Brahmanda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good idea Australia is over 80% desert, why don't you move there and live??
2006-10-31 02:36:23 · answer #10 · answered by graeme1944 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋