2006-10-30 17:32:37 · 9 answers · asked by ashu_koul2001 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Loveless life is possible but lifeless love ~ impossible.
2006-10-30 17:35:33 · answer #1 · answered by saumitra s 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, life follows love. Right? And there is no love without life. When someone is dead, he cannot love and vice versa. Life I think should be full of love, because we communicate with the world around us and we need to love, which is a 'synonym' for respect, tolerance, help, education, etc. Whenever we are in contact with anyone or an animal or object, we need to feel some affection toward him/her/it otherwise we would not want to communicate. And what else is affection if not a form of love?
2006-10-30 18:11:54 · answer #2 · answered by Romi G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A loveless life may be possible, and a lifeless love impossible.
Yet it is better to have loved and lost then to have never have loved at all, as a life without love is darkness without ever knowing light.
Personal desire or the love of something or someone is the basis of our hierarchy of life..... Love, Shelter, Security, Food
We feel it as a new born child for our Mother.
Money may be to root of all evil, but the reason to obtain wealth is to gain comfort and appreciation and become apart of what seems a more happier sexier and loved and admired lifestyle.
Life is all for Love, It's all about Love......we seek it everyday.
2006-10-30 17:47:14 · answer #3 · answered by Keanu 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wonder if we can have life without love or love without life. It's a tricky and elusive connection. I ask myself again, what's life? And in this context at present, let's assume that 'life' is being alive biologically and spiritually.
Therefore, life without love is possible but what's the use for such a life? As normal human beings, we learn to love other people as well as anything, I can't imagine people without love and wonder what they should look like, are they robots?
Moreover, love without life is unthinkable since the life itself is the sole foundation of love, in essence, if there's no life, there's no love. Just look at a piece of rock, for instance.
2006-10-30 17:56:22 · answer #4 · answered by Arigato ne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many times we take lust as love. True love is honouring every being in its right sense knowing its need in the society. If love is "0", lust is on the plus side and hatred on the minus side. That means love is neutral. That needs to be the life.
2006-10-30 19:59:08 · answer #5 · answered by latterviews 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love is a necessity for life. It is love that first of all gives birth to life. It is love that protects life in its early vulnerable stage. It is love that makes life worthwhile at a later stage.Finally, it is love that makes the end of life bearable.
2006-10-30 19:35:47 · answer #6 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order to leave this life we must learn the lesson of love. Love yourself, love others, love God, through Jesus Christ, who has come to teach us how to love, in order that we may live...
2006-10-30 17:52:44 · answer #7 · answered by lee f 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think love is why we live. God lived for love because he loved all of us. We live for those that we love and care about. When we love others as ourselves, it's easy to want to wake up each morning and breathe.
2006-10-30 22:27:06 · answer #8 · answered by Dimples 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
life without love is like sea without water
2006-10-30 18:28:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋