2006-10-30 16:00:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Men's Health
The cervical cancer link has been shown to be false. Earlier studies had ignored some other factors contributing to the difference, and once that was accounted for, there was NO difference in the rate.
Sex is definite better for and with an intact man. Cut men often have to masturbate after intercourse because they can't ejaculate without that extra stimulation. It feels much better for the woman as well. Silkier.
I can't believe anyone would actually want a man to have a healthy body part chopped off because SHE thinks it looks nicer. Anyone that shallow should be ignored. The various health and hygiene arguments for mutilation are without basis. A man who has his foreskin is just as clean and smells the same as his unfortunate brother who had this done to him.
2006-10-31 06:59:33 · answer #1 · answered by Maple 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It all depends on what your emotional & mental state is at the moment of penetration and intercourse; because physically, it is a penis...simply put. If the man has a normal flexible and fully-retractable foreskin there will be no difference at all. Some men have more foreskin than others and the glans (Head) might stay covered even when fully erect.....the same goes for men who have an overly-tight foreskin. The only difference you would feel in this case is that the crown, corona or ridge will not be as prominent, and might give you less sensation in that aspect.
In this case in particular, it will be also the man who will not have the full sensation on the glans (head) because the head would be encased in the foreskin. Then again, if the penis has plenty of girth (thickness) the ridge or the lack of the ridge might not make a difference anyway. Now...for those men who have less foreskin, when the penis becomes erect the foreskin will retract on it's own expsoing the head without having to retract it manually. In this case, the penis will have the same charateristics of a circumcised one.....which means there will be no difference at all. Now....regarding what someone else wrote in here, there is no such thing as the semen not being able to ejaculate out of the foreskin....let's just use logic for a second here......if he can urinate, then he can ejaculate. Does that sound logical? Good. Now, as far as iritating the cervix....Jeez, where do people come up with these things.....In order for anyone to iritate the cervix, you'd need a 10" long penis to continuously slam against the cervix; in which case, it wouldn't matter if the man were circumcised or not.
Now....on the Hygiene issue....I do agree with everyone, cleanliness is next to godliness. Then again, if a girl doesn't wash herself well......there'd be a worse situation....no? It's all a matter of bathing well, and taking pride in being a clean person as far as hygiene is concerned. Like I said at the beginning.....the difference will depend on your mental and emotional state.....because if you're going to be thinking about the difference the whole time you are with this particular guy.....you really won't enjoy the moment. Enjoy the moment.....Enjoy the closeness....Enjoy the sensuality, and after it's over, then ask yourself if there was a difference. Let me know how it went.....I hope it works out!
Best of Luck!
2006-10-31 08:18:36 · answer #2 · answered by Ralph 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Speaking as a man circumcised as an adult, from choice, it's far better both for the man and his female partner after circumcision. The man gains far better sensation during sex and is more comfortable at other times. Hygiene is far better and most women prefer the appearance of a circumcised penis. My wife, who had previous experience of both circumcised and uncircumcised men before we met, tells me that there is no comparison between the two - the woman experiences far more effective stimulation from the very tightly stretched shaft skin of a circumcised penis, which moves against the clitoral and labial areas and during sex she can feel the much more prominent and flared corona (ridge) which develops over the months/years following circumcision. Overall, sex is far better for both when the man is circumcised, but only men, circumcised as adults and their wives/partners (with experience of both) can possibly know how much better!
2006-10-31 04:12:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am not circumcised and have never had problems with sex. My have had sex 2-4 times a week for the last twenty years. I have always enjoyed it and never had problems because I was nor circumcised.
2006-10-31 00:25:46 · answer #4 · answered by EDDIE H 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The foreskin of an uncircumsized penis pulls back and looks just like a circumsized penis when erect. They both function the same way when it comes to sex.
However...I have been told that the sensation when having sex is much stronger for un-circumsized men because their penis is covered by the foreskin all day and it protects it from rubbing against their underwear, etc. When they finally have sex and the foreskin pulls back and the penis is exposed, the sensation is much stronger.
A circumsized penis had decreased sensitivity because it has rubbed against clothing all day every day. So the sensation isn't as strong as with an un-circumsized penis.
That said...taking this into consideration, it would seem as though a man with the circumsized penis would be able to last longer before orgasm because of decreased sensitivity. The un-circumsized man would seem to get off sooner beause of so much more sensitivity in his penis.
2006-10-31 00:14:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No Not Really But The Uncircucised Man's Sperm Seems to get Trapped Under That Extra Skin EWWWWWW
2006-10-31 00:05:17 · answer #6 · answered by mz.j 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Registered Nurse here; Yes there is a difference, it is known fact that uncircumcised men, irritate the cervix more and increase the risk of cervical cancer. Due to the fact, no matter how clean the male is, pulling back the for-skin, and cleaning the area consistently usually is not part of there daily hygiene. For it's my understanding, the foreskin is sensitive and at times if not cleaned gently, will become swollen and uncomfortable. But it's a fact uncircumcised men increases the females chance of cervical cancer.
2006-10-31 00:06:03 · answer #7 · answered by Strawberry Pony 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well - if his glans is large & the ridge (corona) is prominent & thick, this can serve as a sexual device or artifact to the woman's nerve endings in her vagina. similar to the "RIBBED" condoms which proclaim: "Ribbed - for her pleasure" women can feel a wider, rounded & flared corona within their vaginas. circumcised sort of makes it like a toilet plunger - but with the plunger tip placed backwards.
2006-10-31 02:12:40 · answer #8 · answered by blackbird 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe that circumcised men have better sex than uncircumcised.
2006-10-31 00:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
in terms of sensation the uncut goes in smoother with less friction. but that whole foreskin thing worries me if i'm not intimately familiar with his hygeine habits. i mean really intimate.
the cut man has a head that will be a little rougher on the pullout. that can be great for the added texture but sometimes it irritates my skin. using plenty of lube helps. this has been my experience.
2006-10-31 00:16:54 · answer #10 · answered by Informer 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋