You will not believe this, but there weren't any hijackers.
the identities of some Arabian people wre stolen, and used by the FBI as a part of the cover story. They have been identified, 7 of them are still alive, everyone knows this yet the FBI web page still shows those originally identified people.
My calaim that there were no hijackers is based on the fact that there were no planes.
The BTS statistics of all domestic USA flighyts show that two of vthe claimed flights never even took off.
The other two succedded in diappearing with no remains nof aircraft or people found.
Manufactured terrorism
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html
No-planes important
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/matters.html
2006-10-31 15:04:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
There is and was no connection between 9/11 and Iraq. Bush knew this through many sources prior to the war. It takes more than a few short months to plan an invasion. The invasion of Iraq was planned long before 9/11.
All of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudi nationals. If anything, we should have invaded Saudi Arabia (hardly our friend with 6 + oil embargo's in the last 60 years).
2006-10-30 15:53:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. PhD 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Ok, They found people in UK identified as those hijackers because thoese hijackers stole their ID. Not because hijackers are alive. I found that out by going to BBC article mentioned in those 911 theory websites. BBC article mentioned that hijackers likely to have used fake IDs, but conspiracy theorists took that and ran with it like a chicken without its head saying 'see they're alive!'.
It's like someone stealing my ID and robing a bank. Is it so hard to believe that criminals use freakin fake IDs?
These terrorists were from Saudi, UAE, and other nations. Some have lived in German for some time and elsewhere too before coming over.
2006-10-30 16:00:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
1) I don't think any were born there.
2) there were terror training camps in Iraq. Whether any of the 9/11 terrorists trained there, I haven't seen anything yea or nea.
3) We know that Saddam openly supported terror & I'm glad he's out of power. I think the world is a better place for this.
2006-10-30 15:55:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
The terrorist training camps were in Afghanistan. That's why we invaded that country.
2006-10-30 15:45:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by October 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
they were born in Saudi Arabia, one in Yemen,,, trained in Afghanistan with Osama bin Laden, mastermind of 9-11, free to continue training Taliban terrorists on the Pakistan border,,, no connection to Iraq,,
2006-10-30 15:47:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
They were not born in Iraq.
They did not train in Iraq.
(Where on earth did you get the information that they "trained there openly in a terrorist training camp"? There were no training camps when Hussein was there ... Hussein was scared of them and crushed them whereever they started.)
2006-10-30 15:50:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by c_sense_101 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
Nee Saudi Arabia. 2 pts.
2006-10-30 16:00:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Em E 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
They were all from the middle east and all Muslim extremists.
I do think one was born there, but I don't have the reference but as with most terrorists in independent cells, they claim no alliegence to any one government merely a extreme religious view point.
( most people of Islam are great people)
2006-10-30 16:16:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
none where born in Iraq and they never trained there at all there is no connection to the hijackers to Iraq
2006-10-30 15:43:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by roscodog 3
·
2⤊
2⤋