How do you classify gerund phrases?

Question

How to classify gerund phrases whether they are a subject, predicate nominative, direct object, or an object of a preposition..? Any rules?

Answer 1

As a gerund and a present participle take the same form appearing with a verb + ing, they may be a bit confusing if you judge them only by their looks. Yet, their functions are quite different from each other.

1.Present Participle

A Sleeping Baby: This phrase describes a baby sleeping. Therefore, you can compose a sentence with this in mind as “A baby is sleeping.” “Sleeping” in this case is called a present participle.


2. Gerund

A Walking Stick: In this example, you don’t expect a stick to walk. A cane is the meaning this phrase conveys. Naturally, you cannot write as is in the present participle, such as “A stick is walking.” “Walking “ in this particular description is quite different from “sleeping” as illustrated above. The appearances are deceiving. In addition, the individual functions are poles apart. This is called a gerund. A “sleeping” bag is another example of a gerund. Again, a bag is not sleeping, but is designed for sleeping.

Answer 2

A simple definition of a gerund is that it is a present participle (verb form ending in -ing) used as an adjective, as in "a swimming fish", "a flying aeroplane", "an annoying problem", "a running athlete", etc.

Answer 3

A gerund is tht form of the verb which ends in --ing, and has the force of a Noun and Verb

Answer 4

For no sturdy reason. the only way her reviews could make experience is that if there have been common racism against Hispanics in u.s.. there particularly isn't. tutor me the toddler-kisser who could say "we gained't have Hispanics as judges." that is ridiculous. She replaced into no longer arguing against racists who decide directly to exclude Hispanics, asserting "provide us a attempt." the easy meaning of her phrases is that she is greater advantageous to others because of the fact of her race and gender. that for the period of itself is racism. Why won't be able to Democrats see the subject? the two they're in denial, attempting to describe it awy, or agree along with her. And yet they may be the 1st to declare that Clarence Thomas is a dope and should no longer be on the courtroom. His colour would not help him, because of the fact he's no longer a liberal. See additionally Sarah Palin, Condoleeza Rice, Miguel Estrada, etc.