If men went on strike and denied women sex, what would happen?

Question

We could rule the world!

Answer 1

That is so funny. If men denied women sex, they would drive themselves crazy. They simply could not handle it. All women would have to do is a lttle tease show and that idea would be out the window. He'd spill right there.
On the other hand or foot, if women denied men sex, you would see a lot of begging and total relenquishment of control. And what woman does not like to see total submission of a man on his knees?..... LOL

Answer 2

First, women would get mad. Then they'd go home and please themselves. Then, when men came crawling back, begging for their little women to give them pleasure, the women would kick the men out and go on strike-- and a lot of them would stay on strike. Oh, there are plenty of women who wouldn't care particularly, of course-- ones with little self-esteem who think they need a man to complete them, ones who are sexaholics and think they need a man for their pleasure, but there are just as many, if not more, who see men as optional in that area. A man, in my book, is only a good sexual partner if you are married to him, first, and if you both please each other, second. If not both, then what's the point? And if not in that order, then you're giving away the milk for free to someone who might take something else to boot (virginity, good health, self-esteem, and so on).
No, men would not rule the world. In fact, more and more women are buying the houses these days, and the men are often mooching off them (watch any court tv show for a few days and you'll see the pattern emerging even there), so the silly men would get kicked out of the house for not pleasing the women, and there would be a lot more homeless men holding "will work for food" signs out there. Or, possibly, "will work for sex," in this case!

Answer 3

On what planet? If anything it would be the other way around. Men are usually the ones acting like sex is their # 1 priority. And anyways how would you reproduce to pass on your "ruling of the world?" But then again that would bring women closer-Girls on girls? Your right! Who needs men? Lol! Good question though! I really wanna see these answers.

Answer 4

If nothing else in life that I've learned, is never try to figure out a woman. "If men were to go on strike! and deny women sex, in the end you would have a bunch of horny men"

Answer 5

The sexual toy industry would probably make a killing...and life would go on like normal. Except for the really, really horny men walking around...eh in a few hours the strike would be over anyway...sigh*

Answer 6

Good luck.

Despite classical stories to the contrary, neither gender has
ever successfully held a prolonged sex strike.

There are lots of stories, but nothing documented.

If I had to guess, between prostitution, rape and other
deviancy, the withholder discovers that he/she is not the
only source, and therefore, the siege fails.

Answer 7

We men would get very frustrated! and women would rule the world, cos they have these things called Sperm Banks. (thought of by a woman and donated to by stupid men!)

Answer 8

It wouldnt last cause men cant go long without sex, us women on the other hand could handle that. We have toys...

Answer 9

OH that would be bad for both!!!Women would be very crabby, then they would have lovers, and guys would be really pissed off! Do not go on strikes!that's the bottom line!! ;)

Answer 10

no you wouldn't rule the world.. there are some toys out there
for us to play with.. and they might even be more satisfying
then men.