Is he the best player for the money or what????
2006-10-30 14:21:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Hockey
Tucker's the lamest guy on the Leafs, and that's saying something, cause the competition is incredible. He has to pick on kids like Eaves, who hasn't fought since he was what, 16, and is a heck of a lot smaller than Tucker, to make himself feel like a man. Domi was a sonofa, and I'm sure everyone in Toronto was wringing their hands when he left, wondering if they'd ever find as lousy and obnoxious a player, but thank god he's found his heir. So anyway no. He sucks.
2006-10-30 22:00:48 · answer #1 · answered by Michael 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if ur lookin for "best for the money" look at Alexander Semin of the Washington Capitals, hes a young kid whos playin on the powerplay with Alex Ovechkin. sure he only has 8 goals now, 1 less than tuckers 9, but keep an eye on Semin. with Ovechkin feedin him on the man-advantage, he could get an easy 40 goals, and make Ovechkin a top playmaker, not like he already isnt.
But yes currently, as in talkin in this moment, Darcy Tucker is the best for the money. He scored both his goals tonite (#'s 8 and 9) on the powerplay, how many times have u seen Darcy Tucker on the powerplay b4? haha. Simple fact is that hes gettin it done for the Leafs. Will it last?.....who knos, hes already got a target on his back for bein a tough guy, now that hes startin to score goals, more teams will key on him and his #'s could decrease.
I say he gets to 30, but 40 might be a stretch for him. Stick with Semin for the future in this category though.
2006-10-31 00:29:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Martin Biron makes less than Darcy Tucker and he's more valuable to his team even as a back up. If you were to trade Tucker to a Philly perhaps, he aint going to help them win that many more but Biron would change the whole season around.
2006-10-30 22:26:58 · answer #3 · answered by acezr2wild 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Tucker was great in tonight's game. Loved the move when he was coming out of the box. To bad he didn't get his hat trick.
GO LEAFS GO !!!!!
2006-10-30 22:45:51 · answer #4 · answered by queenbee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is like the hundredth time I have seen this question since the season started. NO he is not the best player for the money. He is a dirty player.
2006-10-30 22:40:42 · answer #5 · answered by lidstromnumber1fan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he will get there, but I think he will reach career-highs, and may even get past 45 goals. He's not the best player for the money, but he is up there. And how about that friggin' linesman?! What a goof!
Go Leafs!
2006-10-30 22:54:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he'll be on pace for 57 goals and 109 assists.
2006-10-31 02:03:03 · answer #7 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he will end up with 27
2006-10-31 03:08:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya! Tucker rules!! Did you see last nights game!!! Can you say gold??!! GO LEAFS GO!!
2006-10-31 07:16:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he wont even get 30 this year don't get your hopes up. and hes not the best for the money not even close.
2006-10-31 02:59:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋