in their mind
2006-10-30 13:57:54 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
I dont care if hitler killed 14 million more then saddam im talking about in their mind who was more evil please think about it.
2006-10-30 14:07:48 · update #1
Hitler was the more evil of the 2, and here's why. He understood the fact that hatred, when directed at a certain thing or a person, was a powerful motivational tool. After WW1, the German population felt betrayed because they had lost a war and then they were humiliated by the victors. Hitler turned this humiliation against the Jews, he motivated the entire German population into believing it, and using this evil as a springboard, vaulted himself into absolute power. He did not care whether he was right, nor did he care if he was wrong. All he cared about was power, power for himself and power for the German people. Now, as evil as Saddam was, all he cared about was power for himself. He subjugated the entire country of Iraq to quench his thirst for power, and it was total and absolute. His evil was a personal thing, Saddam had no interest in motivating the country except to have himself pleased, while Hitlers was a global thing, because every country his armies conquered, they spread the evil of Hitlers' Thrid Reich.
2006-10-30 17:33:50 · answer #1 · answered by Hetzer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any one that has had the want to kill the ones under him has been an evil person, if it was Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, even ones that are not in the list of hateful (there are many) A person that reaches the point of being evil is when he finds the "love" to kill his own people.
2006-10-30 14:27:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler
2006-10-30 13:58:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was sadistic. Hitler, I think, believed what he was doing was the right thing. Does that make him more or less evil??
2006-10-30 16:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by adamvanessen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without a doubt Saddam is. Hitler actually thought he was doing a good thing. He was just insane. Saddam knows his actions were evil.
2006-10-30 14:03:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
how much damage either inflicted is not as important as their mental state while committing the atrocities. Hitler took cruelty to a whole new level, but the man was deranged. In his mind, what he was doing was right, and for the sake of his people. His ultimate purpose blinded him, and as mentally unstable as he was, he could not wholly realise the inhumanity of his actions. Therefore, Saddam would have to be the more evil one. He knew what he was doing.
2006-10-30 14:06:43 · answer #6 · answered by Pomie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They were both evil. Someone that does not respect human diginity and humanity, and democracy is more than evil. They are called Tyrann's. I wished these two people had never lived on this planet. We would hav e been in a better position. This world has lost millions of peoples live. It does not matter whether you're Korean, Vietnam, Jew, or any other heritage. I think we all deserve to live in peace. We should not hate each other one of the Lord's greatest preaching . I think sometimes people and human beings forget that.. Greetings from Utah
2006-10-30 15:25:53 · answer #7 · answered by angelikabertrand64 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hitler. he wanted to destroy a whole race of ppl and in the long run just wanted his race to fill the world. He would have ended up killin way more ppl than saddam
2006-10-30 14:05:54 · answer #8 · answered by sjc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler.
2006-10-30 13:59:41 · answer #9 · answered by musiclover4life15 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hitler. for the Holocaust. saddam did not kill as many ppl as hitler did. Saddam did not go to war with all neighbouring countries. Hitler was Mad but yet i think he was genuis. from what i read.
tc
2006-10-30 14:08:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋